Counting Crows… and Tigers
Navhind Times | 3 weeks ago
Navhind Times
3 weeks ago
Luis Dias‘Counting Crows’ has been on my mind for many interconnected reasons.I’m sure most of you have grown up with Akbar and Birbal stories. Let me refresh your memory on one that deals with ‘counting crows’. The gist of it is that envious courtiers complain to Emperor Akbar that he overrates Birbal’s intelligence and wit. So Akbar sets a task for them all: to conduct a ‘census’ of all the crows in his capital, on pain of severe punishment if a wrong answer is given. It stumps everyone, except Birbal of course, who confidently rattles off an arbitrary number.Birbal’s brazenness irritates even the emperor. What if the number is an underestimate? Then, Birbal airily replies that it only means that some crows have gone to visit relatives and friends elsewhere. Likewise, an overestimate can be explained by incoming visits from crow relatives and friends. Birbal triumphs again.Our modern-day courtier, Goa’s Forest Minister Vishwajit Rane has outdone even the great Birbal in his ‘xanneponn’. To rule out the possibility of setting up a tiger reserve in Mhadei Wildlife Sanctuary (the National Tiger Conservation Authority actually asked the state government for a proposal to set one up here), he confidently declares that any tiger found on Goan soil is not a Goan, not even visiting friends or relatives, but just a ‘non-resident’, a tourist, come in to take in the wonderful sights, sounds and smells of ‘amche Goem’. The tigers are just ‘passing through’, migrants on some sort of self-imposed short-term transit visa, if one takes his view.How did Mr Rane arrive at his bizarre conclusion? He says there is ‘no proof’ that tigers are resident in Goa, but he’s unable to categorically state what proof he’s looking for. Tigers don’t exactly erect bungalows and get Forms I/XIV, ration cards or Aadhar cards to flash at forest guards or camera traps, to furnish ‘proof’ of residency or domicile. They’re territorial creatures with territories that don’t respect human state boundaries. It’s quite a simple concept, really. The size of the home range of Panthera tigris depends on its gender, prey abundance and geographic area and can therefore vary between 50 to 1000 square kilometres, even up to 4000 square kilometres in some parts of the world such as Manchuria.But what happened to our famed Goan hospitality? Even if one buys Rane’s weird logic, and assumes that the tiger is some sort of ‘musafir’, shouldn’t one try to make its stay or passage as comfortable as possible? If Goa can be so welcoming to human tourists, why not to our national animal? Shouldn’t pug-falls matter just as much as footfalls?Apparently not, when competing interests such as mining (and all the ‘moolah’ it represents) are at stake, in fact the very antithesis of everything the tiger stands for.Reacting to well-deserved criticism and ridicule that quickly went viral, Rane later said he had been ‘misunderstood’, that Goa was “too small for a tiger reserve” and that he didn’t need advice from NGOs or environmentalists, but would instead take it from “retired IFS officers and the forest research institute, Dehradun”. It’s unclear why Dehradun should be the sole source of such advice.In ‘Tigers and Water Security of India: The Crucial Link’ (2017), Dr Subhadeep Sarkar (assistant professor, Department of Zoology, Serampore College) and Dr Suman Dutta (assistant professor, Department of Botany, Serampore College) soberly conclude: “India’s tiger forests are crucial for the water security of our country. Once any of them is degraded or lost, the country marches one step forward towards destroying its water sovereignty and security that it has enjoyed for thousands of years. So long as the tiger lives, the forests remain protected and under sharp focus of the scientific community as well as commoners. And with it remain protected myriads of streams, wetlands and rivers that form the web of water security around us, one of the most highly valued treasures of mankind.”Some bedtime reading for our newly-appointed forest minister, even if its source isn’t Dehradun. One would think that in view of Goa’s ever-deteriorating water security (ironically caused and aggravated by mining in the first place), it would be another very compelling reason for a tiger reserve. Our own survival is inextricably intertwined with that of the tiger. In fact, even if Mr Rane is right that there are no ‘resident’ tigers in Goa, it is his duty as forest minister to lay the welcome mat for them and invite them in, for the reasons just mentioned.One of the tracks I do know from the American rock band ‘Counting Crows’ is ‘Big Yellow Taxi’ (originally written, composed, and recorded by Canadian singer-songwriter Joni Mitchell), whose lyrics repeatedly emphasise this message: “Don’t it always seem to go/ That you don’t know what you got ‘til it’s gone/ They paved paradise and put up a parking lot.”Our Goan ‘paradise’, be it forests, wetlands, fields, water bodies, hills, in fact any form of Mother Nature is under threat of much more than a parking lot. One can only feel trepidation at the news that, having laid waste to our coastal belt ‘paradise’ in the guise of ‘development’, the greedy focus is now further inland, into the hinterland.Goa is deemed “too small” for a tiger reserve, but not for a coal hub, double-tracking, four and six-lane highways, or a white elephant of another airport. Goa’s never “too small” to be destroyed.Incidentally, in case you’re wondering, ‘Counting Crows’ got its unusual name from ‘One for Sorrow’, a British divination nursery rhyme about the superstitious counting of magpies, which are members of the crow family. There are many versions of the rhyme, but the earliest one reads: “One for sorrow, Two for mirth/ Three for a funeral, Four for birth/ Five for heaven, Six for hell/ Seven for the devil, his own self.”Our house attracts a much higher number than seven, but since the collective noun for crows is a ‘murder’, that isn’t so comforting.Coming back to counting tigers: While the latest Tiger Census Report (2019) has reported a heartening increase in overall numbers, it nevertheless emphasises the continuing need for tiger conservation, (whether ‘non-resident’ or not): “More than 80 per cent of the world’s wild tigers are in India, and it’s crucial to keep track of their numbers. Tigers are at the top of the food chain and are sometimes referred to as “umbrella species”, that is their conservation also conserves many other species in the same area. The tiger estimation exercise that includes habitat assessment and prey estimation reflects the success or failure of tiger conservation efforts.”As I write this, the local press has reported that Valpoi forest-dwellers allegedly admitted that “tigers are not ‘non-resident’”, (so as the negatives cancel each other out, tigers are resident), but the people want their land ownership rights respected. It circles back to the fragile ecological balance between us and non-human ‘dwellers’ on our tiny planet.The fact that so many Goan place-names have ‘vagh’ incorporated into them is evidence of the timeless presence of the tiger as ‘Goenkar’, ‘Bhumiputra’, ‘resident’. This cannot be erased by verbalsleight-of-hand.