AAM Aadmi Party (AAP) News

Can Cong and AAP be friends? Ajay Maken, Sandeep Dikshit lead voices that say never
The Indian Express | 3 days ago | |
The Indian Express
3 days ago | |

As Arvind Kejriwal drums up support among Opposition leaders against the Centre’s ordinance that wrested control of ‘services’ from the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government in the Capital, two former Delhi MPs have emerged as the voices and faces of the distrust the Congress continues to nurse against him.While other Delhi Congress leaders — who witnessed the AAP’s rapid rise in the city’s politics over the last decade and continue to smart from it — have maintained a low profile, Ajay Maken and Sandeep Dikshit have been publicly and aggressively vocal in cautioning the Congress high command against the Delhi Chief Minister’s direct and indirect overtures.Days after the Delhi and Punjab units of the Congress called on the high command and told them to “keep Kejriwal at arm’s length” for “intra-party cohesion”,Dikshit and Maken sharpened their attack on the Delhi CM over the ordinance.“Kejriwal is well aware that he will be sent to jail for 8-10 years if he does not get control of the Vigilance Department,” Dikshit said, adding that he supported the ordinance against the AAP government.Maken joined the chorus, alleging that the AAP convenor’s “true motives” stood exposed, as he had openly sought “enhanced powers over services, aiming to take control over the Vigilance Department”, thus challenging decades of established governance norms. This is a point he has consistently argued since the ordinance was issued.“He conveniently downplays his true intentions. Investigations into scandals like Liquor gate, ‘Sheesh-mahal (Kejriwal’s Rs 171-crore residence…), power subsidy scam, bus purchases scam and others, will reveal the extent of corruption within his administration. And this is what he wants to stop,” Maken tweeted.Speaking to The Indian Express, Dikshit said: “Any Congressman will be chucked out of the party if they make any statement against its national leadership. Then how can the party think of allying with the AAP, whose leader Kejriwal has made more vile statements against the Congress’s national leadership than even PM Modi?”Both Maken and Dikshit also questioned the AAP over its “support of the BJP” on critical issues like Article 370. “What about the removal of Article 370 from Jammu and Kashmir by the BJP-led Centre, which he [Kejriwal] supported, or not signing the Congress’s impeachment motion against [former CJI] Dipak Misra, or not signing the no-confidence motion against the Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairperson that immediately followed?” Dikshit added.A senior Congress leader said that following the duo’s example, other Delhi Congress leaders are “gradually emerging” with sharp criticism of Kejriwal, especially after the latter issued a public appeal to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, seeking a meeting.According to Congress sources, there are two main prickly issues standing between the AAP and Congress. The first is what the Congress insiders describe as “unforgettable, patently false and malicious propaganda” against both its national and local [Delhi] leadership, “on the basis of which Kejriwal came to power”. The second is a Delhi Assembly resolution after the AAP formed its second successive government, demanding retraction of the Bharat Ratna conferred on former PM Rajiv Gandhi – neither of which, the insiders say, will “change or be forgotten”.While senior AAP leaders acknowledge that a united Opposition is key to defeating the BJP, the role that the Congress will play in it is still not clear. The AAP has shared stage with the Congress in the past, but an alliance has not come through since 2013, when the Congress had extended outside support to let the AAP form the government in the city. Before the 2019 Lok Sabha polls, alliance talks between the two parties lasted for months, but ended in a deadlock.While Maken — a former Delhi and Union minister — has never minced his words regarding the AAP and its convenor, it is former East Delhi MP Sandeep Dikshit, the son of the late three-time Delhi CM Sheila Dikshit, who had taken the first potshot, in March this year.On a day when Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and AAP Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh marched to Parliament against the Centre, along with other Opposition leaders, on a host of issues, Dikshit and a group of former Delhi government ministers filed a complaint with Lieutenant Governor V K Saxena against the AAP government and Kejriwal over the now-defunct Feed Back Unit (the AAP’s rivals claim it was used to spy on them). Alleging sedition, they demanded a trial under the UAPA, the anti-terror law.Afterwards, when the CBI summoned the Delhi CM for questioning in the alleged excise policy scam, Maken tweeted that Kejriwal “should not be shown any sympathy or support”, and asked his party colleagues who are lawyers not to represent Kejriwal or the Delhi government in the case.Regarding the ordinance, a senior Delhi Congress leader said the party believed the BJP would “somehow be able to push the legislation through”, so aligning with the AAP on this issue was “not worth it”.Another leader argued that Kejriwal was merely “using the ordinance as a bogey” to make it “appear as if he is the lone voice” fighting for the Constitution. “He wants to look like a self-styled saviour of the Constitution, because he is embroiled in corruption charges that have dented his image. It’s a trap. He is seeking vindication,” the leader alleged.At a meeting with Kharge, Rahul Gandhi, K C Venugopal and others on Monday on the issue, leaders of the Congress’s Delhi and Punjab units argued strongly against extending any support to the AAP. “Delhi Congress leaders spoke against supporting the AAP on the ordinance. However, former Delhi Congress chiefs Arvinder Singh Lovely and Subhash Chopra held that supporting the ordinance was warranted, given the Congress’s previous demand for more administrative powers to an elected government in Delhi. However, both said the final decision was up to the high command,” a source said.On its part, not only did the AAP disparage Maken and Dikshit by questioning their current standing within the Congress, Delhi Minister Saurabh Bharadwaj also accused the duo of “misleading” their own leaders, given that Sheila Dikshit had herself introduced a motion as CM in the Delhi Assembly on September 11, 2002, demanding more powers for Delhi’s elected government compared to the LG.Bharadwaj also tweeted that the motion moved by Sheila Dikshit had made the exact same point that the AAP had made in the Supreme Court, saying, “Amendment in Rules or any order of the Centre cannot take away special status of Delhi which is provided by the Constitution under Art 239 AA. So why are Delhi Congress leaders misleading Mr @RahulGandhi?”Maken said he had never claimed that as Delhi CM, Sheila Dikshit hadn’t sought full statehood or more authority. Rather, he said, Kejriwal wants to gain “unique privileges previously denied to CMs like Sheila Dikshit, Madan Lal Khurana, Sahib Singh Verma and Sushma Swaraj”.Speaking to The Indian Express, he said, “This ordinance is a diversionary tactic by Kejriwal, whose public image has been severely dented after he was caught on the wrong foot on various scams. He is trying to divert public attention from these.”Sandeep Dikshit said, “Which political leader wouldn’t seek more power? But the fact is that when Mrs Dikshit did so, it was within the contours of the Constitution, just like her administration worked within the powers conferred upon her by the Constitution.”

Can Cong and AAP be friends? Ajay Maken, Sandeep Dikshit lead voices that say never
  • Can Cong & AAP be friends? Ajay Maken, Sandeep Dikshit lead voices that say never
  • The Indian Express

    As Arvind Kejriwal drums up support among Opposition leaders against the Centre’s ordinance that wrested control of ‘services’ from the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government in the Capital, two former Delhi MPs have emerged as the voices and faces of the distrust the Congress continues to nurse against him.While other Delhi Congress leaders — who witnessed the AAP’s rapid rise in the city’s politics over the last decade and continue to smart from it — have maintained a low profile, Ajay Maken and Sandeep Dikshit have been publicly and aggressively vocal in cautioning the Congress high command against the Delhi Chief Minister’s direct and indirect overtures.Days after the Delhi and Punjab units of the Congress called on the high command and told them to “keep Kejriwal at arm’s length” for “intra-party cohesion”,Dikshit and Maken sharpened their attack on the Delhi CM over the ordinance.“Kejriwal is well aware that he will be sent to jail for 8-10 years if he does not get control of the Vigilance Department,” Dikshit said, adding that he supported the ordinance against the AAP government.Maken joined the chorus, alleging that the AAP convenor’s “true motives” stood exposed, as he had openly sought “enhanced powers over services, aiming to take control over the Vigilance Department”, thus challenging decades of established governance norms. This is a point he has consistently argued since the ordinance was issued.“He conveniently downplays his true intentions. Investigations into scandals like Liquor gate, ‘Sheesh-mahal (Kejriwal’s Rs 171-crore residence…), power subsidy scam, bus purchases scam and others, will reveal the extent of corruption within his administration. And this is what he wants to stop,” Maken tweeted.Speaking to The Indian Express, Dikshit said: “Any Congressman will be chucked out of the party if they make any statement against its national leadership. Then how can the party think of allying with the AAP, whose leader Kejriwal has made more vile statements against the Congress’s national leadership than even PM Modi?”Both Maken and Dikshit also questioned the AAP over its “support of the BJP” on critical issues like Article 370. “What about the removal of Article 370 from Jammu and Kashmir by the BJP-led Centre, which he [Kejriwal] supported, or not signing the Congress’s impeachment motion against [former CJI] Dipak Misra, or not signing the no-confidence motion against the Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairperson that immediately followed?” Dikshit added.A senior Congress leader said that following the duo’s example, other Delhi Congress leaders are “gradually emerging” with sharp criticism of Kejriwal, especially after the latter issued a public appeal to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, seeking a meeting.According to Congress sources, there are two main prickly issues standing between the AAP and Congress. The first is what the Congress insiders describe as “unforgettable, patently false and malicious propaganda” against both its national and local [Delhi] leadership, “on the basis of which Kejriwal came to power”. The second is a Delhi Assembly resolution after the AAP formed its second successive government, demanding retraction of the Bharat Ratna conferred on former PM Rajiv Gandhi – neither of which, the insiders say, will “change or be forgotten”.While senior AAP leaders acknowledge that a united Opposition is key to defeating the BJP, the role that the Congress will play in it is still not clear. The AAP has shared stage with the Congress in the past, but an alliance has not come through since 2013, when the Congress had extended outside support to let the AAP form the government in the city. Before the 2019 Lok Sabha polls, alliance talks between the two parties lasted for months, but ended in a deadlock.While Maken — a former Delhi and Union minister — has never minced his words regarding the AAP and its convenor, it is former East Delhi MP Sandeep Dikshit, the son of the late three-time Delhi CM Sheila Dikshit, who had taken the first potshot, in March this year.On a day when Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and AAP Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh marched to Parliament against the Centre, along with other Opposition leaders, on a host of issues, Dikshit and a group of former Delhi government ministers filed a complaint with Lieutenant Governor V K Saxena against the AAP government and Kejriwal over the now-defunct Feed Back Unit (the AAP’s rivals claim it was used to spy on them). Alleging sedition, they demanded a trial under the UAPA, the anti-terror law.Afterwards, when the CBI summoned the Delhi CM for questioning in the alleged excise policy scam, Maken tweeted that Kejriwal “should not be shown any sympathy or support”, and asked his party colleagues who are lawyers not to represent Kejriwal or the Delhi government in the case.Regarding the ordinance, a senior Delhi Congress leader said the party believed the BJP would “somehow be able to push the legislation through”, so aligning with the AAP on this issue was “not worth it”.Another leader argued that Kejriwal was merely “using the ordinance as a bogey” to make it “appear as if he is the lone voice” fighting for the Constitution. “He wants to look like a self-styled saviour of the Constitution, because he is embroiled in corruption charges that have dented his image. It’s a trap. He is seeking vindication,” the leader alleged.At a meeting with Kharge, Rahul Gandhi, K C Venugopal and others on Monday on the issue, leaders of the Congress’s Delhi and Punjab units argued strongly against extending any support to the AAP. “Delhi Congress leaders spoke against supporting the AAP on the ordinance. However, former Delhi Congress chiefs Arvinder Singh Lovely and Subhash Chopra held that supporting the ordinance was warranted, given the Congress’s previous demand for more administrative powers to an elected government in Delhi. However, both said the final decision was up to the high command,” a source said.On its part, not only did the AAP disparage Maken and Dikshit by questioning their current standing within the Congress, Delhi Minister Saurabh Bharadwaj also accused the duo of “misleading” their own leaders, given that Sheila Dikshit had herself introduced a motion as CM in the Delhi Assembly on September 11, 2002, demanding more powers for Delhi’s elected government compared to the LG.Bharadwaj also tweeted that the motion moved by Sheila Dikshit had made the exact same point that the AAP had made in the Supreme Court, saying, “Amendment in Rules or any order of the Centre cannot take away special status of Delhi which is provided by the Constitution under Art 239 AA. So why are Delhi Congress leaders misleading Mr @RahulGandhi?”Maken said he had never claimed that as Delhi CM, Sheila Dikshit hadn’t sought full statehood or more authority. Rather, he said, Kejriwal wants to gain “unique privileges previously denied to CMs like Sheila Dikshit, Madan Lal Khurana, Sahib Singh Verma and Sushma Swaraj”.Speaking to The Indian Express, he said, “This ordinance is a diversionary tactic by Kejriwal, whose public image has been severely dented after he was caught on the wrong foot on various scams. He is trying to divert public attention from these.”Sandeep Dikshit said, “Which political leader wouldn’t seek more power? But the fact is that when Mrs Dikshit did so, it was within the contours of the Constitution, just like her administration worked within the powers conferred upon her by the Constitution.”

‘Political chameleon’: BJP, Congress Delhi units on same page against Kejriwal over central Ordinance
The Indian Express | 5 days ago | |
The Indian Express
5 days ago | |

As he continues to reach out to Opposition leaders seeking support against the Centre’s Ordinance wresting control of ‘services’ from the Delhi government, leaders from the BJP and Congress’s Delhi units are unanimous in their offensive against Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal over the issue.After Kejriwal publicly sought a meeting with former Congress MP Rahul Gandhi, leaders from both Delhi BJP and Congress have become more vocal in their opposition against his quest for support from parties and leaders who they said he had himself targeted over corruption charges.Reacting to the AAP national convenor’s meeting with CPI(M) leaders over seeking support against the Central Government’s Ordinance a day earlier, Delhi BJP president Virendra Sachdeva said Kejriwal had made himself a subject of ridicule by “knocking on every door possible” over the issue.“It’s surprising to see Kejriwal, like a political joker, knock on the doors of leaders whom he just till yesterday not only called corrupt but also contested allegations against across the country,” Sachdeva said.“Only a true chameleon-like Kejriwal can contest against the CPM in Kerala, the Samajwadi Party in UP, the Congress in Gujarat, Delhi, Punjab, Rajasthan, MP, Karnataka etc. and the TMC in Bengal and then innocently seek their political support,” Sachdeva added.Leaders from the Congress’ Punjab and Delhi units had, at a meeting with party president Mallikarjun Kharge including senior leaders Rahul Gandhi and K C Venugopal among others on Monday, bluntly argued against extending any support to the AAP in addition to underlying the need to keep Kejriwal “at an arm’s length.”Reacting to the tweet by Kejriwal saying he had sought time to meet Gandhi, Congress leader Alka Lamba had shared AAP Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh’s video attacking parties “run by political families” along with slides of the Delhi chief minister’s meetings with the same leaders seeking support.Lamba underlined the AAP was “bowing before those same political families” that Singh had sought to attack through his speech. “Will you show the courage to repeat it again? Or will you apologise?” she had asked.The AAP had routed the Congress in Delhi—reducing it to nought in successive Assembly elections in 2015 and 2020. It also ousted the Congress from power in Punjab in the 2022 Assembly polls.On Monday, sources said the Punjab unit of the Congress told the leadership that it will go the Delhi unit’s way if the party enters into any understanding with the AAP. A senior leader said the AAP was on a “spree to put the entire Congress behind bars in Punjab”.Among those who attended the Congress leadership’s meeting with the Delhi unit were Delhi AICC in-charge Shaktisinh Gohil, Delhi president Anil Chaudhary, and other senior leaders including Ajay Maken, Subhash Chopra, J P Agarwal, Arvinder Singh Lovely, Devender Yadav, and Haroon Yusuf.Maken, who has already taken an aggressive stance over the ordinance matter against any association with the AAP, reiterated his position forcefully”.“Leaders from Delhi spoke against supporting the AAP on the Ordinance. However, at least two of them spoke in favour of supporting the Ordinance but only due to technical reasons,” a leader, who was part of the meeting, said.“These two leaders, Lovely and Chopra, were of the opinion that support for the ordinance was warranted given the Congress’s previous stand in favour of more administrative powers for an elected government in Delhi. However, both said the final decision regarding this was up to the high command.”Both its Delhi and Punjab units are not in favour of the Congress opposing the Ordinance, with some of their leaders suggesting that the party stage a walk-out when the Bill is put to vote.A Delhi leader had said, “When it comes to the Ordinance, the Delhi unit was of the opinion that the BJP will somehow be able to push it through, so it will be a battle not worth fighting, given the stakes for us when it comes to triggering discontent among our state units across the country by showing any overt support for the AAP”.Taking aim at the AAP chief, a Delhi leader had claimed, “Kejriwal is using this ordinance as a bogey to appear as a self-styled saviour of the Constitution. This is only because he is embroiled in corruption charges which have dented his image.”

‘Political chameleon’: BJP, Congress Delhi units on same page against Kejriwal over central Ordinance
Keshav Prasad Maurya: 'UP is not a hard state, tough only with criminals'Premium Story
The Indian Express | 1 week ago | |
The Indian Express
1 week ago | |

Uttar Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya on BJP’s continuing popularity in the state, Atiq Ahmed’s killing, bulldozer politics, caste and the Opposition. The session was moderated by Senior Editor Shyamlal Yadav.Shyamlal Yadav: You have been the Deputy Chief Minister for the longest time. As a first-generation minister who has worked hard to get here, how do you look at the BJP in UP?We got 52 per cent of the votes and were victorious in 64 Lok Sabha seats in Uttar Pradesh. Now, after winning Rampur and Azamgarh Lok Sabha constituencies, we have added two more seats. In 2022, we were able to win 271 Vidhan Sabha constituencies with the help of our alliance partners.We are deepening our contact with people and ensuring prompt service delivery, having started a Gram Chaupal where we are trying to dispose of all complaints at the local level only. So far, we have held such chaupals in over 17,000 villages and disposed of over 1.22 lakh complaints.Shyamlal Yadav: But in the recently-held urban local body elections —considering that BJP has always done well in the cities — you have lost 80 per cent of Nagar Panchayat member seats, 65 per cent of Nagar Panchayat Adhyaksh seats, 75 per cent of Nagar Palika Parishad member seats and 55 per cent of Nagar Palika Parishad Adhyaksh seats.Your numbers are wrong. We won 89 of the 199 Nagar Palika seats and with allies, that figure is now 91 seats. But if you look at other seats, you need to compare the tally with how many seats the Opposition, namely the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), the Samajwadi Party (SP) and the Congress won. Generally, Nagar Palika and Nagar Panchayat elections are not fought on the basis of parties but issues. But the political atmosphere is such today that we are at a number one position in UP.Though we are accused of ‘bulldozer politics’, it’s not like we’ve cleared massive plots of land. Many complaints are being made, we investigate and in cases of wrong-doing, give back the poor their dues and what they deserveShyamlal Yadav: Isn’t gangster-politician Atiq Ahmed’s murder a challenge for the government?Atiq and his brother Ashraf were big criminals. The government had ensured their cases were put in fast-track courts and they were very close to capital punishment. From the government’s and my personal point of view, the killing should not have happened. A Special Investigation Team (SIT) is looking into the incident and all the murderers have been arrested. They will also be subjected to a narco-analysis test to get to the truth and be given a quick and stern punishment.Shyamlal Yadav: You have popularised your initiative to get Rs 35 lakh crore investment into UP. Have you been able to attract investment to other places in UP than just Noida?Investment proposals have come in for the districts of Bundelkhand, Purvanchal and Rohilkhand where nobody showed any interest earlier. Also this time, the investors are not leaving the projects midway as various departments have formed new policies to facilitate them. Our policies are better than other states because we are employing the Gujarat or the Modi model.From the government’s and my point of view, Atiq’s killing should not have happened. The SIT is looking into the incident and the murderers have been arrested. There will be a narco-analysis test and there will be a quick and stern punishmentP Vaidyanathan Iyer: Employment is a challenge as the Government can’t give a lot of jobs. Of course, they are receiving several facilities from the government but is joblessness causing societal issues?No government can give jobs to everybody. But we are providing opportunities because of which the state’s youth are doing well. There is no dearth of opportunities here. The results of Aatmanirbhar Bharat and the relief package announced post-Covid have begun to be visible on the ground. Small businesses can choose from the Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana (PMMY) or Startup India initiative. Even smaller businesses can choose the PM Svanidhi Yojana. For example, if someone goes to a bank with an Aadhaar card, seeking a loan for a vegetable stall, they will get it without any guarantee. Talented youth can opt for start-ups. They should venture into new areas. The government is ready to train them and provide them with requisite infrastructure. UP is now an education hub with several reputed institutions like IIT and NIT present. We want to build one university in each commissionerate. The government has everything for every stratum. This is the advantage of having a double-engine government. We are witnessing several admissions today because there is an encouraging atmosphere.My father was a small farmer and we lived in a kachcha house. We aspired to save every penny to build a small room for relatives and guests to sit in. This was a desire of not just my family but every poor family. More than four crore houses have been provided under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana, and in UP itself we have provided 60 lakh houses under this scheme. We also offer some foundational support by way of a toilet, gas connection and a power supply under the Awas Yojana. UP is number one in implementing Har Ghar Nal Yojana. When I was young, my father fell sick and we had no money to treat him. So we mortgaged our one-acre land for Rs 5,000 to a neighbouring family to get money for his treatment. After he recovered, we repaid our mortgage and got back our land. Today, poor families are given an Ayushman Bharat card with a Rs 5 lakh health cover.Vandita Mishra: Is there a limit to a hard state in a democracy? Section 144 is imposed at many places, and for long periods, in UP. There are frequent encounters and the use of bulldozers. Is their any conversation within your government on the need to rework policy and image?Replace the word hard state with good governance. We are tough only with criminals. The land mafia has captured several acres in rural areas by terrorising the poor and claiming they are the henchmen of the SP, ministers of the BSP or leaders of the Congress. Being a minister doesn’t mean you can capture someone’s land. If someone is found guilty after investigations and is subjected to legal proceedings, then you cannot use the term bulldozer government. Vacating illegal occupants of lands is good governance, not strictness. If you ask any common villager, they would tell you how during the rule of the SP government, they would be jailed or beaten up for accusing an SP leader of wrongdoing. This doesn’t happen today; we investigate a complaint and undertake legal proceedings. Ever since we have taken over, there hasn’t been a riot in UP. In Ayodhya, the Lord Ram Janmabhoomi dispute went on for 500 years. But after the Supreme Court’s judgment, the temple is being built peacefully.Shyamlal Yadav: More than half of the state universities in UP have been built by former chief ministers Akhilesh Yadav, Mayawati and Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna. Seventeen of the 75 districts were carved out by Mayawati. The BJP was never known for this kind of work. It is good that you have subjected Atiq Ahmed and Mukhtar Ansari to legal proceedings but why target Azam Khan, who was about to finish building a university?We are building universities in all 18 mandals of the state and sanctioned funds. Work has begun at many places and we are trying to complete it soon. Yadav has a problem of putting a stamp on everything, saying that he had announced it during his term. If you have built something when you were in government, then call it yours. They only got 47 seats in the Assembly elections in 2017 because you cannot escape the scrutiny of the people. Good work has happened and is still happening in our time.I’ll put it simply: Some people who didn’t get a BJP, SP or BSP ticket may have decided to pick up the broom. That’s not AAP’s win. That’s an accidental win. AAP has no future in the state and the countrySandeep Dwivedi: Brij Bhushan Singh, an MP of your party, has been accused of sexual harassment. The police investigation is not progressing and the party has also not issued a statement about this.Sportspersons are the pride of the country. A committee formed by the Sports Ministry is investigating the allegations and a police case has also been registered. It’s not appropriate for me to say who is right or wrong because the investigations are going on and the issue is of national import. I don’t think anything needs to be said. But sports is priority as under the guidance of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and UP chief minister Yogi Adityanath, we have organised a Sansad Khel Mahakumbh, which is grooming talent from rural areas.Harikishan Sharma: The UP CM has two Deputy CMs, probably because of the large size of the state. Do you think a big state like UP requires a full-time Home Minister to look after the law and order situation?UP’s law and order situation is much better than what it was 15 years ago due to the leadership of Yogi Adityanath. The common man is not scared, only the mafia is. You can witness Ram Rajya in UP today. The question of a full-time Home Minister is one that only the CM can look into.Harikishan Sharma: The BJP peaked during your tenure as the state unit president. Since then, its performance has been going down. You got 10 lesser seats during the 2019 general elections. The voter turnout in the recent byelections and municipal elections was low too. In your constituency, Prayagraj, only 30 per cent turned out. Does this bother you?I’d like to correct you. In the 2019 general elections, we got more votes than in 2014. Our aim for 2024 is to win all 80 Lok Sabha seats in UP under the leadership of Narendra Modi. In Vidhan Sabha too, our voters didn’t leave us; our voteshare increased by two per cent compared to the previous Vidhan Sabha elections. Both the BSP and Congress vote shifted to the SP. However, the low voter turnout in the civic body elections is definitely a matter of concern.The Election Commission should also do something so that people understand it is their responsibility to vote. They consider this a right but it’s a responsibility as well. People ask for rights but don’t often stick to them and do their duty.As we are to celebrate nine years of the BJP government on May 30, we are planning to rally our workers, visit every person on the electoral roll, do home visits and ask them to vote.Deeptiman Tiwary: There are allegations that your method of improving law and order is selective. People say Mukhtar Ansari and Atiq Ahmed were heavily prosecuted by the UP police and the Enforcement Directorate while some politicians in Purvanchal, Jaunpur or Banaras have a free hand. What’s your response to this criticism?No matter who the criminal is, he will be prosecuted. He has no caste or party. I read in The Indian Express that the Enforcement Directorate’s strike rate is 98 per cent. It’s not suitable to question an organisation with that success rate. The fact is that our critics want older cases of corruption to be forgiven. But with us, there’s no discrimination or bias that takes place.Jatin Anand: The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) says that politics in UP is changing with people now supporting the Delhi model of development. What about the AAP’s performance in the municipal election?The BJP was, is and will be number one. The man, who pretends to be innocent, will have to answer severe accusations of corruption. Yet he says he wears a shirt, pant, keeps a broken pen in his pocket, a muffler around his neck. I’ll put it simply: Some people who didn’t get a BJP or SP or BSP ticket may have decided to pick up the broom. That’s not AAP’s win. That’s an accidental win. AAP has no future in the state and the country.Shyamlal Yadav: Do you think a caste census should happen before the general election?I’m not against a caste census. Those parties who want it should be fair to all their members first. The BJP should congratulate Mallikarjun Khargeji because nobody was able to become the Congress president outside the Gandhi family. Regardless of the caste question, we want every person in society to get education, representation and respect. In India, if anyone is responsible for giving respect to OBCs, it’s Narendra Modi. Did the Congress ever make any backward caste/class person the Prime Minister? They can’t because it’s not in their nature. They just want to set an election agenda.Shyamlal Yadav: There were reports of tension between you and Yogi Adityanath in the first tenure of this government. How is it this time?This is Opposition propaganda. We are very friendly, work together as a team and deliver good results. Even in the Nagar Palika and Nagar panchayat elections, people are voting for the party.Shyamlal Yadav: Your defeat in the Sirathu Assembly seat was like CB Gupta’s in 1957 and that of Kamalapati Tripathi’s in 1967. What went wrong?The party leadership doesn’t fight an election on one seat. In UP, for example, we were contesting in 403 seats. And I could give my Vidhan Sabha seat just 1.5 days. Whether you’re a minister or state leader, the voter doesn’t care. He just thinks, this is Keshav ji, he sat and drank with us, today he doesn’t have time to even ask for votes. In 1.5 days, you can’t cover a Vidhan Sabha constituency. That’s what happened.Shyamlal Yadav: UP has become an exporter of unskilled labour due to poverty and unemployment. Your government announced a migration commission during Covid. Can’t you change the situation where people from other states come to UP for work instead?We have the labour data on the basis of which the commission has tabulated who has what skill sets. Accordingly, we are relocating them to projects where they can get an opportunity. We have been able to empower women with over 1.2 crore of them getting jobs and livelihood. We have launched platforms for skill development. We have every kind of manpower and talent, what we need is motivation and hard work. Young people won’t idle away anymore but work 10 hours.Alind Chauhan: The NCRB released a report in 2021 that more than 13,000 cases of violence against Dalits were filed in 2020. The three accused in the rape of a Dalit girl in Hathras have been acquitted.Punishment or acquittal is the court’s work. Filing a chargesheet is police work. We want to ensure that no crime happens. If it does, it is not hidden. If the accused are convicted, prosecute them. If not, let them be.Deeptiman Tiwary: Your government said it would table the report on the 1980 Moradabad riots in the Vidhan Sabha. But the riot-hit have died and legal proceedings are difficult now. What can this report achieve except reopen old wounds?We weren’t in government at the time. If there was a report, the then government should have come out with it but they hid it. Because the majority of those killed were Hindus and belonged to Scheduled Castes, it’s our responsibility to tell the truth.Vandita Mishra: Even Nitish Kumar pulled Bihar out from jungle raj. But he didn’t need a bulldozer, did he?Though we are accused of “bulldozer politics”, it’s not like we’ve cleared massive plots of land. Even now, many complaints are being made, we investigate and in cases of wrong-doing, give back the poor their dues and what they deserve.Shyamlal Yadav: As per an Indian Express investigation, senior officers and some BJP leaders bought land in Ayodhya surrounding the Ram Janmabhoomi after the Supreme Court verdict. Why is no action being taken on the report?The inquiry report is with the government and under consideration. If any official is found to have violated rules and bought land by misusing their authority, they will certainly face action.

Keshav Prasad Maurya: 'UP is not a hard state, tough only with criminals'Premium Story
Huge stride towards Oppn unity: JD(U) announces mega meeting, TMC to attend
The Indian Express | 1 week ago | |
The Indian Express
1 week ago | |

The Janata Dal (United) on Sunday said the first official meeting of Opposition parties would take place in Patna on June 12, with the top leaders of several non-BJP outfits set to attend. The Trinamool Congress (TMC) confirmed that West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee would attend the meeting, which will be the first big statement of Opposition unity in the run-up to the Lok Sabha elections next year.“There will be a meeting of Opposition parties in Patna on June 12,” senior JD(U) leader Manjit Singh said. A top JD(U) leader said Chief Minister Nitish Kumar had revealed the date of the meeting during an informal meeting with his party colleagues. Congress insiders in New Delhi said Mamata Banerjee had asked Nitish Kumar to take the lead in organising the event since several parties, including the TMC, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), and the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS), have a problem with the Congress being viewed as the leader of any eventual anti-BJP coalition. Since meeting Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and senior party leader Rahul Gandhi in Delhi last month, Nitish has been reaching out to the Opposition to bring them together on one platform before the Lok Sabha elections.A senior JD(U) leader said, “The meeting is finally going to happen in Patna. The idea was first mooted by West Bengal CM and TMC supremo Mamata Banerjee during her meeting with Bihar CM Nitish Kumar recently, recollecting socialist legend Jayaprakash Narayan’s efforts to form the Janata Party in 1977 by bringing together several parties under one roof. We all liked to go with the symbolism and Patna is ready to host a historic show of Opposition unity.”Earlier this week, JD(U) chief spokesperson and advisor K C Tyagi hinted that work on organising the Patna meeting was going on. “Nitish Kumar has already met all the top Opposition leaders and now the stage is set to take it to a logical conclusion. The Bihar CM has been able to break the ice between the Congress and the AAP, and the Congress and the TMC,” he said.TMC MP Sudip Bandyopadhyay said Mamata Banerjee would attend the event. “The Opposition parties will put up a united fight against the BJP. Mamata Banerjee has made her points clear. If the Congress follows the same path, then it will further strengthen Opposition unity. Nitish Kumar came down here to meet Mamata Banerjee. She proposed that the meeting be held in Patna. They have accepted it. If all parties come together, then it will definitely boost our unity.”However, West Bengal Pradesh Congress Committee (WBPCC) president Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury said notwithstanding what happens in Patna, his party would continue to fight the TMC in the state. “Even in Parliament, sometimes they (TMC) stand with us and sometimes they don’t. But that will not stop our fight against the TMC in Bengal. Notwithstanding the Opposition meeting and whether both parties come together, our movement against them will go on.”The JD(U) sees the Patna conclave as a great boost for Nitish Kumar’s ambition to showcase himself as a key leader in the anti-BJP camp in the run-up to the Lok Sabha elections. According to party insiders, there could be one-on-one contests between the BJP and an Opposition party in about 475 seats.Besides the JD(U), Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), and Hindustani Awam Morcha (Secular) from Bihar, and the TMC, the other parties that are expected to attend the rally are the Samajwadi Party (SP), Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM), Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), and Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray). The confirmation of the presence of the top leaders of some of these parties is awaited, according to JD(U) insiders.— With inputs from ENS Delhi and Kolkata

Huge stride towards Oppn unity: JD(U) announces mega meeting, TMC to attend
ED conducts searches at premises of AAP MP Sanjay Singh’s aides
The Indian Express | 1 week ago | |
The Indian Express
1 week ago | |

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Wednesday conducted searches at four places, including the premises of close associates of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh, in connection with a money laundering probe it had launched on the Delhi government’s now-scrapped liquor policy.MP Singh alleged that ED has raided the houses of two of his associates – Ajit Tyagi and Sarvesh Mishra – in relation to the Delhi excise policy case. “Sarvesh’s father is suffering from cancer. This (the raid) is torturous,” Singh said.An official said they are currently conducting searches in four places – belonging to Puneet Tyagi, Ajit Tyagi, Amit Goyal and Sarvesh Mishra. “During the questioning of businessman Dinesh Arora and Amit Arora, the director of Buddy Retail Pvt. Ltd, the ED got to know about these four persons and they are conducting searches to get some evidence,” a source said.The ED case, which was registered in September last year, is based on a CBI FIR filed in August. The CBI had booked Sisodia, three excise department officials and several vendors and distributors among the 15 accused it had arraigned in its FIR.मोदी की दादागिरी चरम पर है।मैं मोदी की तानाशाही के ख़िलाफ़ लड़ रहा हूँ।ED की फर्जी जाँच को पूरे देश के सामने उजागर किया।ED ने मुझसे गलती मानी।जब कुछ नही मिला तो आज मेरे सहयोगियों अजीत त्यागी और सर्वेश मिश्रा के घर ED ने छापा मारा है।सर्वेश के पिता कैंसर से पीड़ित हैं ये… pic.twitter.com/4mwfV7j9GV— Sanjay Singh AAP (@SanjayAzadSln) May 24, 2023 https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.jsThe CBI FIR had stated: “Praveen Kumar Rai, Director, MHA… has conveyed directions of the competent authority for enquiry into the matter of irregularities in framing and implementation of the excise policy of GNCTD of Delhi for the year 2021-22 by Central Bureau of Investigation. He has also forwarded a letter of L-G Vinai Kumar Saxena alleging irregularities in framing and implementation of the excise policy.”“The OM is enclosed herewith, which discloses that Manish Sisodia, Deputy CM; Arava Gopi Krishna, then Commissioner (Excise); Anand Tiwari, then Deputy Commissioner (Excise); and Pankaj Bhatnagar, Assistant Commissioner (Excise) were instrumental in recommending and taking decisions pertaining to excise policy for the year 2021-22 without the approval of competent authority with an intention to extend undue favours to the licensee post tender,” it added.

ED conducts searches at premises of AAP MP Sanjay Singh’s aides
  • Delhi liquor policy case: ED conducts searches at premises of AAP MP Sanjay Singh’s aides
  • The Indian Express

    The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Wednesday conducted searches at four places, including the premises of close associates of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh, in connection with a money laundering probe it had launched on the Delhi government’s now-scrapped liquor policy.MP Singh alleged that ED has raided the houses of two of his associates – Ajit Tyagi and Sarvesh Mishra – in relation to the Delhi excise policy case. “Sarvesh’s father is suffering from cancer. This (the raid) is torturous,” Singh said.An official said they are currently conducting searches in four places – belonging to Puneet Tyagi, Ajit Tyagi, Amit Goyal and Sarvesh Mishra. “During the questioning of businessman Dinesh Arora and Amit Arora, the director of Buddy Retail Pvt. Ltd, the ED got to know about these four persons and they are conducting searches to get some evidence,” a source said.The ED case, which was registered in September last year, is based on a CBI FIR filed in August. The CBI had booked Sisodia, three excise department officials and several vendors and distributors among the 15 accused it had arraigned in its FIR.मोदी की दादागिरी चरम पर है।मैं मोदी की तानाशाही के ख़िलाफ़ लड़ रहा हूँ।ED की फर्जी जाँच को पूरे देश के सामने उजागर किया।ED ने मुझसे गलती मानी।जब कुछ नही मिला तो आज मेरे सहयोगियों अजीत त्यागी और सर्वेश मिश्रा के घर ED ने छापा मारा है।सर्वेश के पिता कैंसर से पीड़ित हैं ये… pic.twitter.com/4mwfV7j9GV— Sanjay Singh AAP (@SanjayAzadSln) May 24, 2023 https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.jsThe CBI FIR had stated: “Praveen Kumar Rai, Director, MHA… has conveyed directions of the competent authority for enquiry into the matter of irregularities in framing and implementation of the excise policy of GNCTD of Delhi for the year 2021-22 by Central Bureau of Investigation. He has also forwarded a letter of L-G Vinai Kumar Saxena alleging irregularities in framing and implementation of the excise policy.”“The OM is enclosed herewith, which discloses that Manish Sisodia, Deputy CM; Arava Gopi Krishna, then Commissioner (Excise); Anand Tiwari, then Deputy Commissioner (Excise); and Pankaj Bhatnagar, Assistant Commissioner (Excise) were instrumental in recommending and taking decisions pertaining to excise policy for the year 2021-22 without the approval of competent authority with an intention to extend undue favours to the licensee post tender,” it added.

From Sukhvilas to PTC, AAP turns up heat on Akali Dal amid its BJP realignment buzz
The Indian Express | 1 week ago | |
The Indian Express
1 week ago | |

In an escalation of conflict between the ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and the Opposition Sukhbir Badal-led Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD), Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann targeted the Akali Dal Monday while raking up the row over the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC)’s move to give the exclusive rights to a Punjabi television network, PTC, for telecasting Gurbani from the Golden Temple.Addressing a public function in Sangrur district, CM Mann attacked the SGPC’s president Harjinder Singh Dhami, charging that instead of allowing all channels to telecast Gurbani from the Golden Temple, Amritsar, Dhami was allegedly toeing the line of “his political masters” to give the rights only to one channel. The CM was referring to PTC, which is owned by the Sukhbir Badal family.The CM said Dhami did not have any moral right to give “sermons” to him after having allegedly sought votes for the Akali Dal in the recent Jalandhar Lok Sabha bypoll.Mann even alleged that the SGPC was acting like a “puppet” in the hands of the Badal family and was being used by them for fulfilling their “political designs”.On Sunday, Punjab rural development and panchayat minister Kuldeep Singh Dhaliwal had warned action against the Sukhbir Badal-owned Sukhvilas Spa Resort located in New Chandigarh, echoing Mann’s allegation that it encroached on the forest land. Dhaliwal asked encroachers to vacate the panchayati and forest lands soon or face action.Rejecting Dhaliwal’s charges, SAD spokesman Mahesh Inder Singh Grewal said, “The claims made by the minister are a series of falsehoods. His allegations hold no truth whatsoever. The Sukhvilas project has not violated any laws of land and there are no illegalities associated with its construction.”The AAP won the prestige battle in the May 10 Jalandhar bypoll, with the party nominee Sushil Kumar Rinku defeating the Congress candidate Karamjit Kaur Chaudhary by over 58,000 votes. While the AAP and the Congress respectively garnered 34.05% and 27.44% of the votes polled, the respective vote shares of the SAD and the BJP stood at 17.8% and 15.2%.The AAP swept the 2022 Assembly polls, bagging 92 of the state’s total 117 seats as against the then incumbent Congress’s 18 seats. The election saw the SAD ‘s tally plunging to 3 seats, its worst-ever performance, while the BJP could get just 1 seat.In the 2022 election, the SAD-BSP alliance had garnered overall 20.29% votes in the nine assembly constituencies which fall in Jalandhar parliamentary constituency, while the BJP’s vote share was 9% there.Daljeet Singh Cheema, SAD secretary and spokesperson, said, ”Our Jalandhar vote share dipped compared to 2022 election, but we improved in rural areas while in urban areas we suffered a dip. We need to work hard, but we are connected to the grassroots.”On the Gurbani telecast row, Cheema said, ”It is not for the first time that such a controversy has happened. PTC pays hefty amount to SGPC to get these rights because of which devotees enjoy uninterrupted Gurbani telecast without any commercial ads…This is a matter pertaining to information and broadcasting ministry, which doesn’t fall under the CM’s jurisdiction. It is sheer political rivalry and jealousy besides being an AAP bid to deflect public attention from main issues.”The SAD patriarch and five-time Punjab CM Parkash Singh Badal passed away on April 25, days before the Jalandhar bypoll. He was remembered by the masses, especially in rural areas of the state.“Though SAD-BSP alliance couldn’t do much in Jalandhar bypoll, people do remember Badal Senior, who used to be praised even by his critics. In villages people do recall the times under his government,” said Harcharan Singh, a resident of Gill village of Ludhiana.Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited the Akali Dal’s Chandigarh office on April 26 to pay his homage to Badal Senior. He also wrote a piece to offer his glowing tribute to the departed SAD patron.Union Home Minister Amit Shah visited the Badal village to pay his respects to Badal Senior, hailing him as “Bhaichare ka Sardar” for fostering brotherhood and dedicating his life to Hindu-Sikh unity.One of the oldest allies of the BJP and a founding member of the NDA, the SAD had parted ways with the saffron party and walked out of the Modi government in September 2020 in protest against the Centre’s now-repealed three controversial farm laws.There has been fresh buzz that the SAD may again ally with the BJP in the coming days. “After Jalandhar bypoll, a word is doing the rounds that SAD should align with BJP. The two parties complement each other. If they had been together, they might have won Jalandhar bypoll,” said Gurcharan Singh, a local chemist.However, state BJP president Ashwani Sharma dismissed such speculations, saying that his party will go alone in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls.Meanwhile, Harjinder Singh Dhami, while commenting on the Gurbani row, said Tuesday that the SGPC will float open tender to grant the Gurbani telecast right from the Golden Temple as its existing 11-year contract with the G-Next Media Pvt Ltd, a company which owns the PTC channels, will expire on July 24, 2023. “We will be floating tenders for giving Gurbani telecast rights in which anyone who can fulfil the conditions can take part. No favouritism was done with regard to the existing contract too,” he said.Cheema charged, “To target Akali Dal, AAP is attacking the Sikh institutions like SGPC and Punjab CM himself is leading this campaign by using derogatory remarks against the SGPC president,” pointing out that the SGPC is the apex elected Sikh body in the country.The AAP’s chief spokesperson Malwinder Singh Kang denied that his party’s moves were “politically motivated” against the SAD, saying these were only directed against the “wrongdoings of previous governments, whether of Akalis or the Congress”. “We are not targeting anyone, we are just pointing out the anomalies. Now that SGPC president has stated that tenders will be floated soon for granting Gurbani rights, it is a welcome step. We had raised this issue to highlight the existing monopoly of one channel over the telecast rights.”

From Sukhvilas to PTC, AAP turns up heat on Akali Dal amid its BJP realignment buzz
To naysayers on Kejriwal govt's reforms, we can only say 'tough luck'
The Indian Express | 2 weeks ago | |
The Indian Express
2 weeks ago | |

Sometimes, when power structures get too entrenched, every act of reforming them seems like defiance. And when an actor stepping in from the outside seeks to revitalise a broken system, their attempts are dubbed as chaos. Since 2014, the Arvind Kejriwal government has sought to infuse new energy into the dilapidated governance system, and if naysayers resist these changes, “tough luck” is all that we can say.Shailaja Chandra’s article, ‘With great power, respect’ (IE, May 12) is a remnant of old attitudes. It betrays the conventional mindset of the bureaucracy and the old guard. What is most surprising is that despite having been a career civil servant, the writer has not mentioned civil services reform, and has squarely laid the blame on the Kejriwal government.The need for civil services reform is evident from the meaning of the word “bureaucratic” used in common parlance. It means “connected with bureaucracy or bureaucrats and involving complicated official rules which may seem unnecessary”. Clearly, common people perceive bureaucracy more as a hindrance than a solution. Scholars of the Indian civil service system, like K P Krishnan and T V Somanathan, have noted that in respect of the neutral and fair implementation of the rule of law in dealing with individual citizens, the powerful and the influential have often received favourable treatment with the poor and the weak often treated shabbily.Another malaise of the system is that promotions in the services are not linked to the outcomes that the civil servant has generated on the ground. Krishnan and Somanathan also point out that despite legal and constitutional protections, the service has not adequately resisted political interference, partly because of the incentive structure. They also observe that the civil service has not performed well when it comes to providing effective public services and promoting economic development. This is largely due to, among other things, inconsistent or arbitrary application of known policy, delays in decisions, “transaction costs” in money and time due to bribery, and lack of competence. It would be worthwhile to have these issues addressed, instead of using the old playbook of “just blame the politicians”.Shailaja Chandra has rightly noticed that the bureaucracy in Delhi answers to multiple bosses. However, the areas in which these “bosses”, or to use a more suitable word “authorities”, exercise their powers have been very carefully delineated by the Constitution of India, laws passed by Parliament and the Delhi legislature. As such, it is not acceptable for any authority to decimate another.The writer’s views also reflect the prevailing attitude that political tugs of war are meaningless. On the contrary, at a time when the Centre is increasingly damaging the federal structure, these supposed “tugs-of-war” are often a passionate struggle by the people to seek what is due to them: Enfranchisement, protection and welfare. The tussle in Delhi has been closely observed by the entire country, and the people have become alive to how the Centre has encroached on the powers of various states.The administrative clashes until 2015 managed to stay away from the public eye because they were between competing ideas from the same outdated paradigm. But the Aam Aadmi Party came in with revolutionary ideas. At that time, the thought of high-quality education being provided in government schools was a dream so distant that no administrator even attempted it. And free health services were so unimaginable that most considered it a fool’s dream. Thus, AAP challenged the old ways of the administration, and many officers saw the scope to be more proactive and innovative. In these social times of media times, people find out about political events with the swipe of a finger. So, when administrative clashes do happen, they are bound to be noticed by the public.What the writer has also got wrong is that Kejriwal did not come with a “long political and administrative acumen”. On the contrary, as a former civil servant, he had closely seen the rot in the system. He had first-hand experience of how corrupt politicians were often hand-in-glove with corrupt officials. Kejriwal understood the nuances of government procedure, but not with complacency — he argued for robustness in the system, and responsiveness from officials. Many civil servants also welcomed this. He and his ministers did see some officials as part of the problem but also acknowledged those who were honest, committed and efficient.AAP and its leaders had the idealism of youth which many in the system found unpalatable. Kejriwal did not believe in power games and their diplomatic ways, because for him politics was a means for the welfare of the country, not an arena for massaging egos. In nine years of the AAP government, honest and efficient officers have continued to find their voice and implement ideas with robustness. The freedom, trust and respect that the writer has spoken of are already present in the Delhi government. The space for dissenting opinions and diverse perspectives is available — it is up to the personnel to use this space constructively, and not for doing the bidding of certain other “bosses” they serve.The message is clear — the old guard is gone; the administration cannot be located in tall ivory towers anymore. Today, administrators are not mere paper pushers. They are responsive and innovative. And when mindless rules impede their functioning at the cost of public welfare, those rules need to be reconsidered and reformed. It is not just elections that make it a people’s government — it also requires a robust, responsive and compassionate bureaucracy.The writer is national spokesperson of AAP

To naysayers on Kejriwal govt's reforms, we can only say 'tough luck'
Khattar’s Jan Samvad programme disrupted again, a woman Sarpanch throws her dupatta at his feet
The Indian Express | 2 weeks ago | |
The Indian Express
2 weeks ago | |

Haryana Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar’s ongoing Jan Samvad (public connect) programme in Sirsa district was disrupted again Monday when a woman sarpanch confronted him, took off her dupatta (stole) and threw it on his feet. The woman was quickly removed from the stage and whisked away from the venue by the woman police personnel deputed on the spot.While the chief minister was addressing the gathering and interacting with them to hear their grievances, the woman, later identified as Naina Jhorhar, began raising the issue of non-availability of adequate staff in her village’s Primary Health Centre and there being no college in the radius of 25 kms. Khattar tried to convince her that her grievances would be redressed, but the woman continued talking on the microphone.Khattar told her that she can give her issue in writing. But, the woman continued speaking and said that she was an elected representative. She claimed that there was a murderous assault on her husband. As Khattar tried to interrupt and told her that there was no point of an argument, the woman said, “Mere pati pe jaanleva hamla hua hai. Toh, Sir agar aap nahi sunoge na, toh ek hindustani aurat ki izzat hoti hai (she uttered a few words, that were not clearly audible) and then she took off her dupatta and threw it on the chief minister’s feet and said “toh ye raha aapke kadmo mein, hindustani aurat ka dupatta”.While she was being removed from the venue, Khattar addressed the audience and said, “Dekhiye ye Jan Samvad ka matlab behas-baaji nahi, vohi jo maine pehle kaha tha, vohi yeh tamasha hai. Yaani hum rajneeti karne na aayein, baat kahein, baat sunein (The motive of this Jan Samvad is to share thought. Express ypur grievances and listen to the solution being offered. Do not politicise this event)” .Khattar said a few words that were not clearly audible and then said, “Aise thode hota hai, le jao isko le jao (This is not done. Take her away) ”.Later, the woman told media persons that her husband was attacked by a few men who have yet not been arrested.Meanwhile, a senior officer blamed the Opposition parties for the ruckus created by the woman“It is all part of the conspiracies being hatched by the Opposition, especially AAP. They provoke the CM deliberately to create a scene, shoot the videos and make it viral. It is not the only thing that the CM is doing during Jan Samvad.There are a large number of public-welfare issues that he is initiating and launching solely in the interest of people of Haryana,” the officer said.  Monday’s incident occurred a day after Khattar had rebuked a man in the gathering in Dabwali area when he entered into an argument with the chief minister over an issue. As the man sitting in the audience attempted to interrupt and say something, Khattar said, “Rajneeti mat karne do isko. Yeh rajneeti karne vaala hai Aam Aadmi Party ka karyakarta, isko utha kar ke pitayi karo aur bahar fenko (Don’t let this man do politics. He has come here to politicise the event. He is an AAP worker. Thrash him and throw him out)”.The remarks evoked a sharp reaction from AAP leader Anurag Dhanda who tweeted a video clip of the Jan Samvad and Khattar “used language, which does not behove a CM”. “AAP workers will ask you questions in each and every Jan Samvad programme. Yesterday you got our party workers detained in Sirsa, today you have got our party workers assaulted by the police in Dabwali,” Dhanda said, adding the AAP workers are not afraid of facing lathis or going to jails

Khattar’s Jan Samvad programme disrupted again, a woman Sarpanch throws her dupatta at his feet
At public meetings, BJP seeks to expose ‘nawabi mentality’ of Arvind Kejriwal
The Indian Express | 3 weeks ago | |
The Indian Express
3 weeks ago | |

Smarting from the recent Supreme Court verdict that handed the reins of ‘services’ to the AAP government, the BJP Sunday fanned out across the national capital to pitch Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s alleged VIP and anti-poor credentials as part of an informal bid for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections.Aimed at exposing corruption allegations against the AAP government, the meetings saw party leaders juxtaposing the BJP-led Centre’s welfare schemes for the economically backward sections with the accusations related to Kejriwal’s “nawabi mentality” to the mix.The BJP announced it will intensify its fight against the AAP government’s “corruption” and “scams”, especially at unauthorised colonies, city slum clusters, and urbanised villages, at its public sensitisation meetings, or Jan Chetna Sabhas, in seven Assembly constituencies.“Drowned in corruption, the Kejriwal government is trying to showcase some administrative powers given by the Supreme Court as a clean chit to its government but Kejriwal should understand that the BJP will intensify its fight against corruption,” Delhi BJP president Virendra Sachdeva said at public meetings in Bawana and Rithala.Sachdeva especially sought to stoke anger on the issue of Arvind Kejriwal having allegedly spent Rs. 45 crore on the renovation of his official residence and accusing him of neglecting the development of Delhi Dehat and unauthorised colonies.While Sachdeva announced that the BJP’s “movement to expose Kejriwal’s Rajmahal bungalow scam” will continue, party National general secretary Dushyant Gautam brought up the issue of “freebies.” “Instead of doing development, Kejriwal has only shown dreams of freebies to the people of Delhi and has worked for his political development. Behind every scheme of Kejriwal government, either his personal benefit is hidden or there is corruption,” alleged Gautam.“Kejriwal has shown that he is not concerned about the poor by not implementing the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana in Delhi and building a lavish bungalow for himself,” he said and declared that voters would “uproot him from Delhi in the elections of 2024 and 2025.”At Rajendra Nagar, Leader of Opposition in the Delhi Assembly Ramvir Singh Bidhuri talked about the Delhi chief minister’s “special person” status. “Today, the people of Delhi want to ask why Kejriwal, who pretends to be a common man needed to become a special person…today Kejriwal has 106 security personnel of Delhi and Punjab Police engaged in his security whereas before joining politics, Kejriwal used to talk about not taking security,” Bidhuri alleged.“Today, he is running a government in which two ministers committed corruption and are in jail. His 45 crore Sheeshmahal is also giving proof of his corruption,” the LOP added.Union Minister of State Meenakshi Lekhi said while the Narendra Modi government was strengthening the road infrastructure of Delhi with projects like the Pragati Tunnel, and Mahipal Gurugram Tunnel among others, Kejriwal had “harmed the poor of Delhi” by not implementing the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana, Ayushman Bharat Yojana, and Atal Bima Yojana. “After the construction of his palace, he has become the most luxury-loving chief minister of the country,” she alleged.Northeast Delhi BJP MP Manoj Tiwari said, “Kejriwal installed carpets worth Rs 20 lakh, curtains worth Rs 1 crore, interior worth Rs 11 crore, automatic doors, and toilet seats worth Rs 4 lakh in his Sheeshmahal…We will expose this nawabi mentality of Kejriwal.”

At public meetings, BJP seeks to expose ‘nawabi mentality’ of Arvind Kejriwal
Kejriwal promises ‘massive administrative overhaul’, hours after SC verdict
The Indian Express | 3 weeks ago | |
The Indian Express
3 weeks ago | |

HOURS AFTER the Supreme Court ruled in favour of the elected government on the issue of control over administrative services, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal promised a “massive administrative overhaul”.Addressing a press conference, Kejriwal said that the government, henceforth, would be “lean, thin, accountable and responsive”.In a sign of things to come, the government effected the first transfer within an hour-and-a-half. IAS officer Ashish More, who was the Secretary of the Services Department, was replaced by 1995-batch IAS officer Anil Kumar Singh.In the evening, Kejriwal also met Lieutenant-Governor V K Saxena, who has been responsible for services since taking over nearly a year ago.Addressing a press conference, Kejriwal targeted Prime Minister Narendra Modi and said the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government had been fighting for its right to exercise control over the services department for eight years.“Eight years ago, on May 20, 2015, Prime Minister Narendra Modi got an order passed by the Centre that matters related to services will be governed by the L-G through the Centre. This meant that officers working in the Delhi government, from top to bottom, their postings, transfers and ordering disciplinary action against them, would no longer come under the elected government. This meant that if I see any officer taking bribes, I cannot take any action against him, I can’t transfer him. I can’t appoint the education or health secretary, despite being the Chief Minister,” Kejriwal said.He added that because of this notification passed by the Ministry of Home Affairs, both his “hands were tied behind his back and he was thrown into a river and asked to swim”.While the relationship between the AAP government and the bureaucracy has been cordial at best since the party came to power in 2015, the past year has seen a complete breakdown, with ministers alleging that officials have skipped scheduled meetings, defied direct orders and stalled important files.Kejriwal said that over the next few days and weeks, officers would be transferred on the basis of their performance so far. “There are some officers who, for the past few months, stalled the work of the people of Delhi. These officers will be identified and they will have to pay for their actions. But there are many others who are honest and were feeling suffocated because they wanted to work — all these officers will get the opportunity to work and perform. The dead wood, the corrupt, the inefficient will be removed from important posts and will be replaced by good, honest, responsive and compassionate officers. The entire administrative system will be rectified — the entire system is rotten. A system will be created which is accountable to the people and responsive to their needs. A lean, thin, accountable and responsive government will be set up,” he said.“I see that there are many posts which are unnecessary. Any official occupying these posts only ends up stalling the work of citizens. It is better if they are not there. Such posts will be identified and either left vacant or abolished. Where more posts are required, they will be created,” said Kejriwal.Meanwhile, responding to Kejriwal’s allegations on the L-G not clearing proposals for transfers and postings of officials, L-G House officials said they had received “no such request” from either the chief minister or his ministers. “Any assertion made in this regard is totally false and fabricated. As a matter of fact, L-G responded proactively to the AAP government’s various demands for appointments, made in public domain, including that of the principal secretary in PWD,” they said.

Kejriwal promises ‘massive administrative overhaul’, hours after SC verdict
SC has done well to underline power of elected govt in DelhiPremium Story
The Indian Express | 3 weeks ago | |
The Indian Express
3 weeks ago | |

As Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud read out a unanimous judgment, treating Delhi on par with full-fledged states (except for three entries in the State List), and giving control over the civil servants to the elected government, memories of what has been going on since 2015 flashed before one’s eyes. The need for the Lieutenant-Governor (L-G) to abide by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers on all matters except police, land and law and order was settled by the Supreme Court in its 2018 judgment. However, it had left the question of control over services (officers) undecided. This was addressed subsequently but had to go to a still bigger bench because of dissent.Finally, we have today a decision which may or may not be followed in letter and spirit but will nonetheless be almost impossible to overturn.Citizens of Delhi have become accustomed to watching a periodic tug of war between Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and the political executive and each of the three L-Gs — starting with Najeeb Jung, followed by Anil Baijal and now, the incumbent, V K Saxena. The conflict came to a head in 2021, when the central government brought an amendment to the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act, 1991, giving supremacy to the L-G over the elected government. It made it incumbent on the elected government to refer almost everything to the L-G and stopped the Delhi Assembly from framing rules, setting up committees or conducting inquiries. This amendment to the NCTD Act was passed as a supplement to the constitutional provision under Article 239 AA and most retired law officers said then, that it was questionable whether Parliament could bypass the constitutional provisions and give more powers to the central government. Whether the Supreme Court has referred to the NCT supplementary amendment Act is not clear right now but by observing that the “L-G’s powers do not empower him to interfere with the legislative powers of the Delhi assembly and the elected government”, it does not uphold the amendment.While dwelling on the question of services, the apex court observed that “if administrative services are excluded from the legislative and executive domains, the ministers would be excluded from controlling the civil servants who are to implement the executive decisions”. In effect, the verdict makes it incumbent on officers to report to the chief minister and his council of ministers.One might well ask why the subject of officers and whom they report to should take up the time of a series of benches of the Supreme Court. The IAS cadre referred to as AGMUT is an acronym to encompass the governments they are required to serve — apart from Delhi, the states of Goa, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram and the union territories of Chandigarh, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Puducherry, Daman, Diu and Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Lakshadweep and additionally, now, the union territories of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh after these were formed in 2019. The services of an AGMUT cadre officer are placed at the disposal of any of the constituent states or union territories by the Union Ministry of Home Affairs. By and large, officers report either to the chief minister or the L-G or the administrator as the case may be. Except for a few aberrations, the officers report that they are treated with respect and consideration and their advice is listened to.But in the last seven years, Delhi changed this status quo. Officers had grown accustomed to administering a population of some 20 million ranging from the tony areas of Lutyens Delhi and high-end private colonies to massive urban conglomerations like Dwarka and Rohini and a population of some seven million living in unauthorised colonies. Another million live in urban villages and two million in slums. This posed enormous challenges, the likes of which major state governments, though having a larger area and larger populations, do not face in the same way. The challenges of supplying electricity and water, constructing and maintaining flyovers and roads, and managing the interface with the Delhi Development Authority for land, and the Delhi Police for public order (when both organisations report to the Centre through the L-G) are not easy. Unlike Mumbai, which is administered by a single state government, there are multiple bosses in Delhi and the stakes are always high. The media too has all the time for Delhi.Until 2015, things were manageable. Whatever disagreements and clashes took place remained within the Secretariat and L-G’s office, mostly unknown to the media or citizens. But the Aam Aadmi Party’s chief minister and ministers did not come with long political and administrative acumen and were not versed in the diplomatic ways in which power games are played. Until 2015, the CMs all knew how to get officers to give ideas and implement the decisions as their own.AAP rose from the India Against Corruption movement and the CM and his band of ministers looked on officers as part of the problem. Some called them corrupt. Others humiliated them in meetings, and the stories of what went inside the House committees are legendary — some say there were even threats of arrest and jail. The Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) was reported to have been unleashed on officers. Until then, the ACB was an unheard-of organisation in the Delhi government — small, inept, and mostly irrelevant — happy nabbing low-level employees caught red-handed accepting bribes. To go after senior officers was monstrous, say the officers.When AAP took over, they made their suspicion and loathing of the bureaucracy clear. Time will tell who will do what, when and how. For now, there is no doubt that the interpretation given by the apex court is legal and cannot be belied. But if officers are required to perform and exhibit zeal to get things done, they must be given freedom, trust and respect. That will beget more loyalty and better performance than efforts to harangue them publicly.The writer is a former Health Secretary and former Chief Secretary of Delhi

SC has done well to underline power of elected govt in DelhiPremium Story
TV reporter held in Punjab, AAP slammed for ‘intimidating’ press
The Indian Express | 4 weeks ago | |
The Indian Express
4 weeks ago | |

A reporter for TV channel Times Now Navbharat and her two colleagues, who had gone to to cover an event of the Aam Aadmi Party government in Punjab, were arrested for allegedly knocking down a woman with their car and using “casteist slurs” against her.While a lower court sent them to 14-day judicial remand, the High Court granted the reporter, Bhawana Kishore, interim bail until Monday.Denying the allegations, the channel said that its reporter was implicated in a false case in a bid by the AAP government to muzzle the media in the wake of its reporting on the Rs 42-crore renovation done at Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal’s official residence.Governor Banwarilal Purohit, sources said, has called Punjab CM Bhagwant Singh Mann and “conveyed his displeasure” over the arrest and has urged him to release the reporter. “If a journalist comes to Punjab to cover an event, and she is arrested, such arrest doesn’t convey a good message about the state,” Purohit is said to have told Mann.The Ludhiana police identified the arrested as Kishore, a reporter with Times Now Navbharat; her colleague Mrityunjay Kumar, and Parminder Singh, who was driving the vehicle.The incident took place when a woman, named Gagan, was on her way to attend the inauguration of an Aam Aadmi Clinic (Mohalla clinic) on Shingar Cinema road in Ludhiana by CM Mann and Kejriwal, police said.In her complaint, the woman said that a rashly driven Innova, with a UP registration number, knocked her down, causing an injury to her right hand, while her phone fell down and broke. The police said that according to the complainant, Mrityunjay and Bhawana alighted from the car and entered into an altercation with her and used derogatory caste-based remarks against her.According to the FIR registered at 9.40 pm Friday by the Division Number 3 police station, Gagan told police that when she asked the car driver why he had hit her, he started arguing with her.Gagan alleged that the woman and another man sitting inside the vehicle also came out and hurled casteist slurs at her. According to the FIR, Kishore said: “Tum log gaadi walon se paisa  Paisa ainthne ke liye kisi bhi hadd tak gir sakte ho (people like you can stoop to any low to collect money from those who own cars).”ACP (Central) Rajesh Kumar said the trio were produced in the court of duty magistrate Anubha Jindal around 1 am at her residence and the court sent them to 14-day judicial remand. However, the court also ordered that they should be produced Saturday morning.The three were again produced in the court of Additional District and Sessions judge Harbans Singh Lekhi amid heavy police security at the Ludhiana court complex. The court sent them to 14-day judicial remand.Hours later, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted interim bail till Monday to Bhawna in response to her plea to quash the FIR filed against her under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.Counsel for the petitioners, senior advocates Chetan Mittal and R S Rai, called the arrests a “political witch-hunt” triggered by the channel’s coverage of the renovation of Kejriwal’s residence. They told the HC that though the channel sent a team to cover the inauguration of government-run clinics after an invite from the media coordinator of the Aam Aadmi Party, “AAP workers did not allow them to enter the venue and kept them waiting outside”. “The petitioners were returning when their car probably brushed past a rickshaw and the petitioners were asked to come out of the vehicle and surrounded. On arrival of the police, they were illegally detained and taken into police custody,” the counsel said.Appearing for Punjab, Advocate General Vinod Ghai said the petitioner should have approached the lower court for seeking bail as a case under the sections of SC/ST Act has been registered against them. Mittal, however, argued how could a person from outside Punjab know the caste of a local.The bench of Justice Augustine George Masih, on going through the FIR and contentions of the parties involved, said, “This court at this stage is of the prima facie view that the offence under the SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is not made out when seen in the light of provisions as contained in Sub Section 3 of Section 8 of the 1989 Act, which is alleged to have been committed. Apart from this aspect, the petitioner No. 1 (Bhawana Kishore) being a senior correspondent of National Network and a 31 years old lady deserves to be granted interim bail in the present facts and circumstances of the case.”Her colleague and the driver were not granted interim bail.Recalling the incident, Ludhiana Additional DCP-1 Rupinder Kaur Sra said: “The police were clearing the area when the accident happened. The CM’s cavalcade was arriving so we told both the parties to clear the road. They were advised to reach a compromise but it did not happen. An FIR was registered as per the Supreme Court guidelines after the aggrieved woman filed a complaint.”The police have registered a case under Sections 279, 337 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sections 3 and 4 of the SC/ST Act.In a statement, Times Now Navbharat said the channel “has been subjected to brazen harassment and intimidation tactics ever since the newsbreak of ‘Operation Sheesh Mahal’, which uncovered the ultra-lavish and disproportionate expenditure incurred in refurbishing the official residence of Delhi CM.”A few days ago, the channel had broadcast a show titled ‘Sheeshmahal’ on the renovation of Kejriwal’s house.The channel added: “In what appears to be an orchestrated series of events on May 5, the team was first denied access on ground to cover the Mohalla Clinic event presided by Mr Kejriwal. While returning from the location at around 4 pm, they were stopped by a group of women in an e-rickshaw which rammed into the car in which Bhawana and the team were traveling. They then forcefully stopped the team, got into a brawl and called the local police. We have reasons to believe that these women were motivated AAP workers. They allegedly claimed that the team abused them with SC/ST remarks. It is incomprehensible as to how people from Delhi in a car would be able to guess the caste of strangers on a street in Ludhiana.”Punjab BJP’s state treasurer, Gurdev Sharma Debi, who met Kishore at police station late Friday, said: “This was not Punjab, but Taliban.”Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan tweeted: “Arrest of fearless journalist sister Bhavna shows your fear Kejriwal ji! You are making a sick attempt to strangle the fourth pillar of democracy; You will not be able to suppress the truth and the voice of the people. The country is watching everything.”But AAP Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh argued that a Punjab court had found the reporter prima facie guilty and sent her to custody till May 19. “BJP and Times Now channel are anti-Dalit. Do they not trust the court?” he asked.AAP Delhi Minister Atishi tweeted: “Shocking news coming in from Punjab. A reporter from a BJP supported news channel has run over a Dalit woman, and on being confronted has used reprehensible casteist slurs. No one is above the law. Punjab Police must take the strongest possible action.”In a statement, the Editors Guild of India urged the Punjab government to release the journalist from detention and direct its police to follow the established procedures.“The Guild also notes that given that the reporter was on a journalistic assignment, the law enforcement agencies should have exercised due restraint with respect to detention and subsequent filing of FIR,” the Guild said.The Press Club of India said it “castigates the highhandedness” of the Ludhiana police and administration for arresting the journalist “in an arbitrary manner.” The Mumbai Press Club also condemned the arrests, terming them a clear instance of “arbitrary use of police power”.

TV reporter held in Punjab, AAP slammed for ‘intimidating’ press
‘Very sad and shameful’: Political leaders slam BJP after wrestlers claim police action at Jantar Mantar
The Indian Express | 1 month ago | |
The Indian Express
1 month ago | |

Hours after India’s top wrestlers, who are protesting at Jantar Mantar in Delhi, alleged that police had manhandled and abused them late Wednesday night, Opposition leaders slammed the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Union Home Minister Amit Shah.The latest confrontation seemed to have started when the wrestlers tried to bring beds to the protest site. Vinesh Phogat also alleged that a drunk policeman had assaulted her brother, and claimed that another police officer had shoved her and Sangeeta Phogat.अभी जब मैं जंतर-मंतर पर खिलाड़ी बेटियों का हाल-चाल लेने पहुँचा तो धरने के बाहर दिल्ली पुलिस ने मुझे हिरासत में ले लिया और अब वसंत विहार पुलिस चौकी में ले आए। pic.twitter.com/8EWIqf92i1— Deepender S Hooda (@DeependerSHooda) May 3, 2023Congress Rajya Sabha MP Deepender Singh Hooda and Delhi Commission for Women (DCW) chief Swati Maliwal, who had reached there in support of the wrestlers, were also removed from the protest site around midnight.Hooda tweeted, “… When I reached Jantar Mantar to inquire about the condition of the sportsperson daughters, the Delhi Police took me into custody outside the dharna.” He added that he was taken to the Vasant Vihar police station later.ये हमारे देश की बेटियां हैं, जिन्होंने देश का मान रखा. हमें कई मेडल लाकर दिए.आज इनके साथ गृह मंत्री अमित शाह की पुलिस बदसलूकी कर रही है.इनका गुनाह बस इतना है कि ये शोषण के खिलाफ आवाज़ उठा रही हैं.@narendramodi जी, आप ऐसा अन्याय क्यों कर रहे हैं? pic.twitter.com/YwShIbZLsM— Congress (@INCIndia) May 3, 2023Sharing a video of Hooda being taken into police custody, the Congress on its official Twitter handle said, “Congress stands firmly with the daughters of the country… The message is clear- we are with you.” It also posted a video of Rio Olympics bronze medallist Sakshi Malik crying and said, “These are the daughters of our country, who kept the country proud. Brought us many medals. Today the police of Home Minister Amit Shah is misbehaving with them. Their only crime is that they are raising their voice against exploitation. Narendra Modi, why are you doing such injustice?”देश के चैम्पियन खिलाड़ियों के साथ इतना ग़लत बर्ताव..? ये बेहद दुखद और शर्मनाक है।घमंड में पूरी भाजपा का दिमाग़ ख़राब हो चुका है। ये लोग सिर्फ़ गुंडागर्दी से सारा सिस्टम हाँकना चाहते हैं। पूरे सिस्टम का मज़ाक़ बनाकर रख दिया है इन्होंने।देश के सभी लोगों से मेरी अपील- अब बस…… https://t.co/4R5mj12kOk— Arvind Kejriwal (@ArvindKejriwal) May 4, 2023Delhi Chief Minister and Aam Aadmi Party national convenor Arvind Kejriwal also slammed the BJP. “Such misbehavior with the champion players of the country? This is very sad and shameful,” he wrote on his Twitter account. “BJP’s mindset has gone haywire with arrogance. These people just want to run the system with hooliganism. They have made a mockery of the whole system. My appeal to all the people of the country- don’t tolerate the hooliganism of BJP anymore. Along with uprooting BJP, now the time has also come to drive them out,” he added.AAP has called a meeting of its MLAs, councillors, and other office bearers on Thursday to discuss the scuffle at Jantar Mantar between wrestlers and police. “We will hold a meeting at the party office at noon to discuss the scuffle,” AAP’s Delhi state convenor Gopal Rai told news agency PTI.We have listened to your 830 Crore worth 100 episodes of ‘Mann ki Baat’Kindly listen to the Mann ki Baat of our champion athletes 🙏#WrestlersProtest pic.twitter.com/sgRdopQF6I— YSR (@ysathishreddy) May 4, 2023Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) leader and Telangana minister Y Sathish Reddy shared a video from the protest site last night and said, “We have listened to your 830 Crore worth 100 episodes of ‘Mann ki Baat’. Kindly listen to the Mann ki Baat of our champion athletes.”

‘Very sad and shameful’: Political leaders slam BJP after wrestlers claim police action at Jantar Mantar
Manish Sisodia got ex-CJI’s legal opinion on excise policy removed: ED
The Indian Express | 1 month ago | |
The Indian Express
1 month ago | |

The Enforcement Directorate (ED), in its second supplementary prosecution complaint, has alleged that AAP leader and former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia had ordered the removal of legal opinion given by former Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and former Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi who had suggested that status quo of the previous excise policy be maintained.The ED alleged that the excise policy was “brought in by the leadership of AAP, specifically by Manish Sisodia to continuously generate and channel illegal funds to themselves.” The agency said that the policy “promoted cartel formations through back door, awarded exorbitant wholesale of 12 percent and huge retail profit margin of 185 percent and incentivized other illegal activities on account of criminal conspiracy by Manish Sisodia.”Special Judge MK Nagpal took cognizance of the ED supplementary prosecution complaint — equivalent to a chargesheet — which was filed against 25 accused persons. However, Sisodia, who was arrested on March 9, has not been arraigned as an accused in this complaint even though his name has been mentioned by the agency.The ED has largely levelled allegations against Sisodia on the basis of the statement of the AAP leader’s secretary C Arvind who told the agency that he was called to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s residence in March 2021 where the “conspiracy” to give wholesale business to private entities and “fix 12 percent margin” was mentioned in a draft group of ministers report for the first time.Earlier, an expert committee report was placed in public domain on December 31, 2020 and comments were sought from the public and stakeholders to suggest measures for augmenting the state excise revenue among other measures.The ED alleged that no such proposal, to fix profit margin and give wholesale business to private entities, was made in the comments received by the public.Arvind told the ED that “Sisodia asked Rahul Singh, the then Excise Commissioner to submit a Cabinet note incorporating the comments/ suggestions received from public/stakeholders.”Quoting Arvind’s statement, the ED complaint further stated: “On 28-01-2021, the Cabinet note prepared by Rahul Singh was placed for consideration. On perusing the Note, Dy. CM found that along with the comments from public, the Department had also submitted legal opinion of Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, former CJI Ranjan Gogoi, and others which broadly suggested “status quo” of the then existing excise policy. The Cabinet was unhappy with the Note. Manish Sisodia asked Rahul Singh, the then EC to remove the legal opinion and submit only the comments from public/stakeholders. Rahul Singh was transferred and Sanjay Goel was posted as new Excise Commissioner.”Also under investigation is the company M/s Pixie Enterprises Pvt Ltd which is “effectively owned by Raghav Magunta”, the son of YSR Congress Party MP Magunta Srinivasulu Reddy, who is also under investigation by the ED.The agency claimed that the company had won “Zone-32 i.e. the airport zone in the bidding” and bid Rs 30 crore Earnest Money Deposit (EMD). However, the licence could not be finalised since it could not obtain a no-objection certificate from the airport. The ED complaint stated that “the EMD amount was refunded to them suo motu by Manish Sisodia without any proposal from the Excise Dept and without the approval of the Council of Ministers who only ratified it at a later stage.”According to the ED complaint, “This is another undue favour done by a leader of the AAP to a member of the South Group. As per the Delhi Excise Rules 2010, the EMD of the successful bidder who is unable to start the operations within 90 days, shall be forfeited. Contrary to these rules Sh Manish Sisodia provided an exception by making this decision in the pre bid queries.”Sisodia’s lawyers told The Indian Express that the ED case was based on statements recorded under pressure that have nothing to do with the case. “The ED has no case against Manish Sisodia. These are all statements extracted under pressure. This is a politically motivated case. The missing cabinet note has no FIR or even a complaint…this allegation was made by the officer under pressure from the L-G office and Chief Secretary,” Sisodia’s lawyers said.

Manish Sisodia got ex-CJI’s legal opinion on excise policy removed: ED
Bribes, bigamy charges & a chiding: AAP MLAs, ministers not new to controversy
The Indian Express | 1 month ago | |
The Indian Express
1 month ago | |

Congress leader Sukhpal Singh Khaira’s complaint to Punjab Governor Banwarilal Purohit against a state Cabinet minister’s objectionable video, on Wednesday, was among the long list of embarrassments that the ruling Aam Aadmi Party has had to face this year.In January this year, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann had ousted Fauja Singh Sarari from his Cabinet after the minister had stirred up a row with an audio clip, in which he was purportedly heard discussing a plan to trap some contractors hired for transportation of foodgrains to allegedly extort money from them.The clip had gone viral on September 11 last year after it was allegedly leaked by his OSD Tarsem Lal Kapoor, who was reportedly upset with the minister for not defending his relative in a police case. Sarari was later quietly removed by the CM in January.Before that, another former minister, Dr Vijay Kumar Singla, was removed from the Cabinet by the CM, who himself had stated that the minister — who held the health portfolio — was involved in corruption cases and they had proof of the same. It was stated that the CM had himself heard the audio in which Dr Singla was heard demanding kickbacks in a tender related to the purchase of health equipment. Singla was sacked on May 24 and was subsequently booked under sections 7 and 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Although he was arrested, he managed to make bail in the case after the state Vigilance Bureau failed to produce the alleged audio clip in court.Earlier in August last year, an objectionable video of first-time Sanaur MLA, Harjit Singh Pathanmajra, had also gone viral. The Opposition then had demanded that Pathanmajra be booked for bigamy. However, the controversy soon died down with the party not taking any action against him. Pathanmajra had said that his second wife had blackmailed him into marrying her and his first wife had no objection to the same. Later, the police had booked his second wife, Gurpreet Kaur for having leaked the video.In another video, Cabinet Minister Chetan Singh Jauramajra, who was the health minister then, was seen asking former Vice Chancellor of Baba Farid University Health Sciences, Dr Raj Bahadur, to lie down on a dirty mattress during an inspection of the hospital attached to the university. Later, an embarrassed Dr Raj Bahadur, who is a top spinal surgeon, resigned from the university. He did not withdraw his resignation even after CM Bhagwant Mann personally intervened. The CM had later divested Jauramajra of the health portfolio.More recently, in February this year, AAP MLA from Bathinda (rural), Amit Rattan Kotfatta, was arrested after a video had surfaced in which the minister’s aide, Risham Garg, was seen accepting a bribe in the MLA’s presence. The Vigilance Bureau had arrested Garg at the Circuit House gate in Bathinda after the complaint by the husband of the Ghudda village sarpanch. At that time, MLA Rattan was inside a room at Circuit House and the complainant had claimed that the MLA had told him to hand over Rs 4 lakh to Risham Garg. Later, the complainant had also released an audio, in which the MLA was purportedly seeking a bribe. CM Mann had then got the audio clip checked by a forensic lab before giving his approval for the arrest of the MLA.In yet another video, Punjab Transport Minister, Laljit Bhullar, was spotted atop the sunroof of a car, as he waved to the cameras. His bodyguards were spotted precariously hanging out of the windows of the SUV. He was seen being escorted by two gypsies, while a BMW followed his Ford Endeavour.Though the exact date on which the video was shot remained unclear, the footage had gone viral on social media. The government did not react to the video.AAP had earlier ousted it former state convener of Punjab, Sucha Singh Chottepur, after claiming that they had a video of the man allegedly seeking a bribe. However, the video never was released in the public domain.

Bribes, bigamy charges & a chiding: AAP MLAs, ministers not new to controversy
Confirmed: Parineeti Chopra and Raghav Chadha to get engaged on May 13 in Delhi
The Indian Express | 1 month ago | |
The Indian Express
1 month ago | |

Actor Parineeti Chopra and politician Raghav Chadha will get engaged in New Delhi on May 13, after weeks of speculation. Rumours about them dating began after they were spotted together at a lunch date in Mumbai last month. Indianexpress.com reached out to Parineeti’s rep for comments.Since then, they’ve been spotted together on numerous occasions, and it was strongly speculated that they’d get engaged while Parineeti’s cousin, Priyanka Chopra, was in the country to promote her recently released show Citadel. While neither Parineeti nor Raghav confirmed their relationship, others seemed to suggest that they were together.Parineeti’s Code Name: Tiranga co-star Harrdy Sandhu appeared to confirm the rumours, when he said at a media interaction that he had already “called and congratulated” Parineeti. “I am so happy that it’s finally happening. I wish her all the luck,” Harrdy told DNA in an interview. Aam Aadmi Party MP Sanjeev Arora on March 28 had taken to Twitter to congratulate Parineeti and Raghav. He wrote, “I extend my heartfelt congratulations to @raghav_chadha and @ParineetiChopra. May their union be blessed with an abundance of love, joy, and companionship. My best wishes!!!”Amid the rumours, Parineeti told Lifestyle Asia India, “If I were nobody or they were not interested in me, that would probably mean that I did not achieve what I tried to achieve as an actor because a successful actor will be famous, will be a part of everybody’s homes, a part of living room conversation, a part of the news, a part of the news channels, a part of digital media, a part of the paparazzi culture, and everything.” Responding to reporters while leaving the Parliament, Chadha had said, “Aap mujhse rajneeti ki sawal kariye, Parineeti ki sawal na kariye (you ask me questions on politics, not Parineeti)…”Chadha is a senior AAP leader and an MP. Parineeti made her acting debut with the 2011 romantic comedy Ladies vs Ricky Bahl. She will next be seen in Chamkila opposite Diljit Dosanjh.

Confirmed: Parineeti Chopra and Raghav Chadha to get engaged on May 13 in Delhi
  • AAP's Raghav Chadha, actor Parineeti Chopra to get engaged this month
  • The Indian Express

    AAP’s Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha and actor Parineeti Chopra are set to get engaged on May 13. Rumours of a relationship between the two have been rife for months, and both had been dodging questions about it. They are both 35.In fact, them being spotted together in Mumbai had caught the attention of Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankar in March. During the Parliament session, Chadha as requested him to allow him to raise the issue of fugitive diamond merchant Mehul Choksi, Dhankar left the House in splits, saying, “You already occupy enough space on social media. This may be a day of silence for you.” Later, responding to a reporter while leaving Parliament, Chadha said with a smile: “Aap mujhse rajneeti ki sawal kariye, Parineeti ke sawal na kariye (you ask me questions on politics, not Parineeti)…” The two were also spotted at an awards function in London earlier this year.A post shared by @varindertchawla The MP, who was at The Indian Express office last month, chose to merely smile and refused to say anything when asked about the rumours. Parineeti is an alumna of University of Manchester, London, while Chadha has studied at London School of Economics. Parineeti has just concluded shooting her upcoming film ‘Chamkila’, co-starring Punjabi singer-actor Diljit Dosanjh. She’s a first cousin of Priyanka Chopra, and made her acting debut in 2011. She has done a series of critically acclaimed films, and has also received a National Film Award.

Opposition Unity Platform: Stoop to conquer
The Indian Express | 1 month ago | |
The Indian Express
1 month ago | |

The oldest party in the country is the Indian National Congress. The biggest party in the country is the Bharatiya Janata Party, also by far the richest. In the last Lok Sabha elections (2019), all BJP candidates together won 37.4 per cent of the votes that were polled. The Congress’ candidates won 19.5 per cent of the votes. There are regional and state-specific parties that are quite influential and rule many states.India’s electoral map is a multi-coloured political mosaic. The BJP’s aim — not concealed — is to make it a monochromatic mosaic. The Opposition parties’ (those who are opposed to the BJP) goal is to replace the BJP at the Centre and form a liberal, progressive and inclusive government.In every election since 2014, the BJP seeks votes not in the name of the party or its manifesto but in the name of Mr Narendra Modi. It has gone to the extent of appealing to the voters of Karnataka — the state will elect a new government on May 10 — to “hand over Karnataka to Modi”. For the BJP, it is Mr Modi who is the candidate in every constituency. The BJP thinks that ‘Modi everywhere’ is enough to achieve its aim.As of today, it appears that the Opposition parties do not have a common leader/candidate behind whom they are willing to rally. This may change, but we are looking at the position today. Minus this seeming disadvantage, the Opposition parties have many pluses and strengths, and this essay is intended to explore how the Opposition parties can leverage their strengths.Some extreme options are ruled out. The Opposition parties will not, and cannot, unite to form a single new party, a la 1977, when the Janata Party was formed. None of the Opposition parties will cede the entire space in a state to another party. Despite appeals to forbear, AAP contested the elections in Uttarakhand (2022) and Karnataka (2023) and TMC in Goa (2022). So, while total Opposition unity is desirable, it does not seem feasible.The alternative is an Opposition Unity Platform (OUP). An OUP will need each party to make concessions to others and gain from the concessions made by the others. The outline of the scheme is roughly as follows: create four columns of states and union territories and put each state/UT in the appropriate column (the number denotes the number of LS seats)Of course, it must be acknowledged that the BJP is more dominant than the ‘Lead’ Opposition party in many of the states (it has 302 MPs in the Lok Sabha).In my view, if an OUP is formed, the Congress can legitimately expect to take the lead in fighting the BJP in about 209 seats. Likewise, another Opposition party among SP, TMC, RJD, JD(U), DMK, BRS and AAP can take the lead in about 225 seats. In three states, there are 2 or 3 parties that are in a position to take the lead to challenge the BJP. In seven states with 53 seats, the winner may turn out to be a covert ally of the BJP.Next step: all parties on the OUP must willingly subscribe to the rule that while the Lead party will contest a majority of the seats in the state concerned, the Lead party will be obliged to give each seat to the candidate who has the best chance of winning the seat irrespective of the Opposition party to which the candidate may belong. Sometimes, this may mean denying the seat to the Lead party’s own member. The goal is not to maximize the number of seats that each Lead party may win but to defeat the BJP’s candidates in the maximum number of seats. All Opposition parties must stoop to conquer.The arithmetic is simple. The BJP is in a position to win over 150 seats. Among the Opposition parties, the Congress alone is in a position to win over 100 seats. Every other Opposition party, even if there is a wave in its favour, can win a maximum of 40 seats but, together, they can win up to 150 seats. The BJP is not unbeatable. If the Opposition parties willingly subscribe to the plan that I have outlined, there is a credible path to victory.

Opposition Unity Platform: Stoop to conquer
BJP calls Kejriwal ‘luxurious king’, AAP points to PM’s new residence
The Indian Express | 1 month ago | |
The Indian Express
1 month ago | |

The BJP trained its guns on Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal over the expenditure on rebuilding and renovation of his official Civil Lines residence. The AAP hit back, saying the nearly 80-year-old house was structurally unsafe and had to be rebuilt.Alleging the Delhi government had spent over Rs 45 crore of taxpayers’ money on the project, Leader of Opposition in the Delhi Assembly Ramvir Bidhuri called Kejriwal a “luxurious king” and demanded his resignation. “When Delhi was struggling with Covid, CM of Delhi was spending crores on getting his house renovated. In 2013, he used to say he will neither take a house, security or official vehicle. But he ended up spending Rs 45 crore on renovation of his house,” alleged the BJP leader.He was referring to a report by a news channel, Times Now Navbharat, which said the expenditure on work in the CM House was around 45 crore.AAP said the property that was rebuilt did not belong to the CM but was a government-allotted house. “The house was in a dilapidated state, having been built… in 1942. After three serious incidents, which included the ceiling of the CM’s parents’ room falling, the ceiling of CM’s bedroom collapsing, and office ceiling collapsing, the Public Works Department recommended construction of a new house,” AAP said in a statement.After the incidents, a request was made to the PWD for an assessment, which ordered an audit. The audit report recommended the house be rebuilt. An estimate was prepared and sanction approval was cleared by the finance department, after which a tender was floated. Officials said Rs 30 crore was spent on the CM’s house while the rest was spent on his Camp Office on the premises.The house that Kejriwal occupied in 2015 was spread over an area of almost 1,400 sqm, which included ground and first floors. After the rebuild, the house has an additional floor and total area has increased to 1,905 sqm, documents show.According to PWD documents accessed by The Indian Express, the first sanction for work in the house was granted on September 1, 2020. This included work on an RCC-framed structure, along with electrical work and an automatic fire alarm system. The second sanction was granted in May 2021 for “providing and fixing a modular kitchen, laundry and pantry etc”.This was followed by a sanction in October 2021 for “balance civil work for additional areas”. More sanctions were granted in December 2021 and June 2022.As per the break-up provided in PWD documents, apart from civil, electrical and plumbing work, smart lighting fixtures of different wattage and sizes (2,446 fixtures); energy efficient ceiling fans (80 fans); and a dumbwaiter lift (to deliver food) are part of the cost. Apart from this, installation of 23 curtains with fabric curtain track and motor are also part of the project.AAP said the costs had to be seen in context of the amount spent by other governments on similar projects. “The estimate for the new Prime Minister’s sprawling house alone is Rs 467 crore, while the actual cost of the Central Vista project is estimated to be Rs 20,000 crore. Further, renovation cost of the PM’s 7 RCR residence was three times the estimate. Just renovation was carried out at a whopping Rs 89 crore against an estimated cost of Rs 27 crore,” the party further said in its statement.“Repair work of Delhi L-G house alone has cost Rs 15 crore in the past few months… BJP is raising this non-issue only to divert attention from real issues. They don’t wish to respond to serious allegations made by former J&K Governor Satya Pal Malik who has attributed the Pulwama attack to lapses of the Modi government,” the party said.Delhi BJP president Virendra Sachdeva said, “Kejriwal should own moral responsibility and resign. Many projects were postponed due to Covid between 2020-2022 but work on CM’s house continued”.

BJP calls Kejriwal ‘luxurious king’, AAP points to PM’s new residence
Raghav Chadha: ‘BJP sees AAP as its challenger nationally; only Kejriwal can take on PM Modi’Premium Story
The Indian Express | 1 month ago | |
The Indian Express
1 month ago | |

Raghav Chadha is among the dynamic young leaders of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), who has seen it grow both in Delhi and Punjab. His toughest challenge was to build the party organisation ground up in the Majha belt of Punjab, once the hotbed of militancy. Apart from manning election backrooms, Chadha has emerged as an articulate party spokesperson.We didn’t inherit a golden state. Everything was in a shambles — be it a fragile law and order situation, a bankrupt economy, defunct welfare schemes, poor infrastructure, schools and hospitals. In the past year, the Bhagwant Mann government has done some remarkable work. From starting 117 schools of excellence, to getting an adequate number of trained teachers and redoing the entire school infrastructure similar to what we had done in Delhi, we have kickstarted an education drive. In healthcare, we are strengthening the primary health care structure with more than 500 mohalla clinics. In terms of finances, Punjab had a debt of roughly Rs 3.75 lakh crore. But our excise revenue this financial year has increased by about 40 per cent. Our GST has increased by roughly 17 per cent and our income from property sale and registration has gone up by 78 per cent. This is unprecedented growth in the revenue stream of the government. So finances are being taken care of, revenue leakages are being plugged, compliance is being ensured. And all this has happened without any increment in the rate of taxes or any additional levies. As regards law and order, we have ended gun culture, busted 80 modules and cracked down on pro-Khalistani sympathisers. The government is developing low cost housing, townships, redoing cities, putting up sewage and water treatment plants. We’ve provided 300 units of free electricity. Anybody would tell you that they had not seen any government in the last four decades of the post-militancy era perform so much in their first year.Being a border state, Punjab has been critical for Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) which wants to destabilise it and Jammu and Kashmir for its ulterior motives. Amritpal is a factory-made product commissioned to tinker with the peace and harmony of the state. But we have  the right political will to counter them.Under the current BJP regime at the Centre, federalism has been thrown out of the window. We are struggling to get our Rural Development Fund of Rs 3,000-odd crore, which is our right. When it comes to national security, we work closely with the Centre. Politics should take a backseat. We have been receiving some support on this.Solving the drug menace is a multi-tier activity. When you curtail supply and when you nab the dealers, you also have to give a parallel healthcare support system to the addicts and help rehabilitate them. So, the government is working on both fronts. As you have seen that the government of Punjab petitioned the High Court on the previous sealed reports submitted by the SIT (Special Investigation Team). These sealed envelopes were never opened by successive governments for fear of the big fish tumbling out. Give us some more time.There is complete political will to get him. The Punjab Chief Minister himself comes from the artist fraternity and feels the pain of loss. In fact, the Punjab government has acted against those who didn’t surrender and counter-fired at the police, who were the principal attackers. We are in contact with the Central government, foreign law enforcement agencies, Interpol. Forget administration, we’re also his fans.Look, I have been fortunate enough to work with Bhagwant Mann for the longest time. I was his first friend and have assisted him in his first tenure as an MP since 2014, when I was assigned the responsibility of being the secretary of the parliamentary group of our four MPs. I’ve had a working and personal relationship with him all these years. I am being accused wrongly by the Opposition. I am not the super CM. I’m just the super brother of the super CM, that’s all.Quite frankly, there is a tried and tested model of governance in Delhi, which many states are learning from. The Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M K Stalin inspected schools in Delhi. If other state governments can borrow a leaf from our book, why can’t our own state government? There is a fantastic working relationship between the Punjab government and the Delhi government of Arvind Kejriwal.  The two states signed a knowledge-sharing agreement to learn from the best practices of each other.Allegedly he was there in Bathinda jail when these interviews were done but within a 100-metre radius around the jail, there is no network because jammers have been installed. So there cannot be a video call or an internet-based conversation or a VoIP call that can take place. The Punjab Police has already issued a clarification. We are given to understand it could be Rajasthan because he was there for a while.In Delhi, before the first financial year of this policy could be completed, active efforts were made by the Lieutenant Governor (LG) and the BJP-run MCD to stall its implementation. Shops were not permitted to be opened, stakeholders involved were denied permissions. Much before we could come out with the results of the increase in revenue, we saw cases being lodged and people being investigated for some alleged scam that happens to be only present in the minds of BJP leaders. Punjab is a full state, there was no interference from any stakeholder and a proper implementation of the policy took place. The policy wasn’t flawed, the BJP’s intent was. They could interfere in Delhi because it is not a full state; the Lieutenant Governor, the MCD and other stakeholders are involved.This is a classic misunderstanding. It was never withdrawn by the political executive. Every year, the excise policy of every state government is presented afresh when the budget is presented. When it came to renewing this policy, the LG stalled it, saying we had to revert to the old system. The political executive did not withdraw it.Work distribution and allocation of portfolios as per the Constitution are the responsibility of the Chief Minister. However, as a spectator, the size of the Delhi Cabinet is 10 per cent of the overall strength of the Delhi Legislative Assembly. It is just seven people, including the Chief Minister. But portfolios are many. So even if you were to equally divide them among these people, everyone would end up holding more than a dozen.  We have to increase the size and number of the constituencies, amend the Constitution, make 20 per cent of the MLAs as ministers. Quite frankly, it’s the prerogative of the Chief Minister.We have maintained from day one that the BJP’s objective is not to arrest just Manish Sisodia or Satyendar Jain or Raghav Chadha. The idea is to destroy AAP and its leader Arvind Kejriwal. The objective is not one alleged excise irregularity, the idea is to completely eliminate the AAP, the idea of the AAP. They perhaps think we’re the only challengers to the BJP. I have been saying this for a very long time, pre-Punjab and post-Punjab, that if there is one man that can challenge the might of the BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, it is Arvind Kejriwal. BJP leaders fear only AAP and Kejriwal.  The only challenge they see at the pan-India level is Kejriwal because AAP has certain ingredients that other political parties lack. In Gujarat, where I was co-campaign in-charge, I came to know that the BJP’s national leadership had given a message to its people and cadres not to worry about the Congress, even if it won three to six seats more than what they got last time. But they were told to eliminate AAP.However, we have maintained that if you arrest one Sisodia, hundreds of Sisodias will come up. He is the name of an institution that has redefined Indian politics and school education. And by putting him behind bars, you can’t kill the institutional idea of him. He’ll be out soon.We’ve seen the blatant misuse of Central agencies over the last eight years. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has had only 23 convictions in the last eight years although it registered 3,550 new cases. This translates to a conviction rate of less than 0.05 per cent. With the pre-trial arrest being the only agenda of the ED, it is trying to eliminate the Opposition in general, and the AAP in particular, from Indian politics.AAP doesn’t think about filling spaces. We function as a family, we work together, live together, eat together, govern together. And the void that Mr Sisodia has left will be filled the moment he’s back in action. We have full faith in the judiciary. You will see the streetfighter he is once he is out.I’m not privy to the exact numbers and the metrics used. Having gone to villages over the last two-and-a-half years, the primary education is in a shambles. There are no schools. Even if school buildings exist, neither students nor teachers show up.A minimum educational qualification is mandated by the Election Commission. As a people’s party, we’re only advancing what people have been asking for a while.We no longer have the Anti-Corruption branch (ACB) with us unlike the first 49 days of our first term in 2013. The Sheila Dikshit-led Congress government had it for 15 years and prior to that, all chief ministers of Delhi had it. When we got into office in 2015, two key elements of administration were snatched from us. One was the services, which meant we couldn’t have a say in bureaucrats’ transfers and postings. The second was the ACB. Both these mechanisms now come under the jurisdiction of the LG. The Supreme Court has reserved its judgment on which office should have a say over these departments and we hope to have clarity in one month. With the full administration in Punjab, there’s a complete crackdown on corruption irrespective of the offender’s political colour or bureaucratic might. Chargesheets have been filed and people have been convicted.It is the Central government’s resolve to fight corruption that is being questioned. People are asking how, out of the total number of cases registered by the CBI, 95 per cent are against Opposition parties. The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) of 2022 has been amended in such a manner that you can keep a person in jail for months under the garb of an investigation. Between 2014 and 2019, there has been a 1,000 per cent rise in the number of cases registered under this Act.It’s not about comparing one individual’s qualifications with another. The question before us is should the elected representative have a bare minimum education or not? Why is the BJP so scared? In fact, the LG recently made an obnoxious remark. He said a degree is only the receipt of the fee that you pay at a college. Is he belittling the entire education system of India?AAP’s individual strategy is not important, what is important is the collective strategy of the people of India to defeat the BJP.  If you rewind to 1977,  everyone got together — the socialists, communists, Jan Sangh and the people of India — under a strategy of pitting one candidate against the one Congress candidate and they ended up defeating the mighty Indira Gandhi. Something similar is required in 2024 to defeat the mighty BJP and Prime Minister Modi.  Unemployment is at a 45-year high, inflation at a 30-year high.  The average debt of a farmer has gone up by 53 per cent. More than 30 farmers commit suicide every day. The BJP polled about 31 per cent in 2014 and 39  per cent in 2019 as its overall vote share. That means more than 60 per cent of the population is voting against the BJP. The Opposition and people need to think about fragmentation of this vote.As somebody who considers Kejriwal as his mentor, leader, friend, philosopher and guide, I would certainly say that my leader is the only one who can take on the might of the BJP and PM Modi. A new brand, vocabulary and a new idea of politics is  required to challenge the BJP. If people like the alternative, they will vote.Not at all. It’s been a fantastic debut. A political party in its first outing in a state, where the BJP is considered invincible, wins five seats and gets 13 per cent of the vote. It becomes a national party. It’s a huge achievement. If you want to juxtapose this with 2017, you can draw a parallel with Punjab that year and Gujarat in 2022. A few years on, you should see AAP  in Gujarat.As somebody who’s been on foreign soil and been asked about domestic politics, I have maintained that we should not rake up domestic politics. When we go to a foreign country, we don’t go there as BJP or AAP or Congress leaders, we represent the country. Having said that, let’s not make a political leader’s questions about the conduct of the ruling party the same as questioning India’s credentials overseas.The existing collegium system has been upheld by the Supreme Court from 1992. Any attempt to tinker with the independence of the judiciary is per se unconstitutional. When names are sent by the collegium, they keep sitting on it and bargain with the judges. Then they will spoil the internal evaluation status of names suggested; they will manufacture reports and make a case to convince everybody the person is unfit to be a judge. Every right-thinking individual needs to oppose this.When communal violence happened in Delhi, ministers, MLAs and the CM were on the streets. We summoned the public policy head of Facebook. We took each of the stakeholders to task to ensure that peace and harmony are not tinkered with. We took a stand against bulldozer politics.Raghav Chadha is among the dynamic young leaders of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), who has seen it grow both in Delhi and Punjab. His toughest challenge was to build the party organisation ground up in the Majha belt of Punjab, once the hotbed of militancy. AAP posted an overwhelming win in Punjab despite the strong footprint of both the Congress and Akali Dal. It was because of this success in Punjab that Chadha was sent to Gujarat as the co-campaign in-charge for the Assembly elections there. AAP may have got five seats but notched up a vote share of 13 per cent. Apart from manning election backrooms, Chadha has emerged as an articulate party spokesperson.

Raghav Chadha: ‘BJP sees AAP as its challenger nationally; only Kejriwal can take on PM Modi’Premium Story
The message in AAP's rise to the status of national party
The Indian Express | 1 month ago | |
The Indian Express
1 month ago | |

Politics is for the uneducated. Politics is a dirty game. It is impossible to survive in politics without corruption.These and other truisms defined Indian politics for a generation of Indians like me who grew up in the 1980s and 1990s. That the idea of honest, patriotic and educated Indians coming together to form a viable political force seemed remote, perhaps even a pipe dream, just 10 years back is a testament to how low politics had stooped in the first 60 years after India’s independence. Never mind that it was a few honest, patriotic and educated Indians who had led the independence movement, drafted our Constitution and laid the foundations of a modern, democratic nation.This is why the emergence of the Aam Aadmi Party as a national party in just 10 years is nothing short of a miracle in Indian politics. Born from the historic India Against Corruption movement in late 2012, there were few political observers who believed that AAP would survive beyond the first few years.Indeed, obituaries of AAP have been written (and continue to be written) every single year since its formation. Some mistakes were made, but AAP learned from them and grew stronger with every passing year. Eventually, though, it was the sheer force of the collective will of crores of Indians, who for long had yearned for a platform of honest, alternative politics and stood steadfast in their support for AAP all these years, that saw the party overcome every obstacle thrown at it and emerge as the most successful political start-up in India’s history.Today, AAP is the youngest political party to traverse the journey of becoming a national political party in 10 years. AAP is also the youngest political party to form a majority government in two states — Delhi and Punjab — within its first 10 years and gain substantial vote shares, and win assembly seats in Gujarat and Goa.In the process, many established political truisms were demolished. First, the success of AAP has proved that politics in India can be done without corruption. It has proved that political parties can fight and win elections without indulging in corruption and that they can govern successfully without looting the state treasury. It is no mean feat that the Delhi government’s budget has increased by an unprecedented two-and-half times in the last eight years, and the excise revenues of the Punjab Government have increased by 40 per cent in just the last year.Till AAP became a political force, money power and political power were always seen as going hand-in-hand. Money will buy you power and power will give you crooked means to accumulate more money. In the process, the assets of political representatives multiplied. These were the only rules of the game, which ensured that the poor keep getting poorer and the rich get richer. Till date, the biggest criticism AAP gets is that it works too much for the poor and gives them disproportionate benefits. Unlike established political parties, no one accuses AAP of being in the pockets of top corporate groups in India.Second, the success of AAP has shown that change is possible. If you dream of transforming India, you can do it. In 75 years of Independence, not a single political party can claim to have done revolutionary work in multiple fields of governance — be it transforming the government schools of Delhi or building a model health infrastructure system comprising of world-class mohalla clinics, polyclinics and government super-speciality hospitals, providing free and 24×7 electricity to residents, free and piped water supply to all households, free bus rides for women or reducing the wretched air pollution of Delhi by 30 per cent. What also sets AAP apart is that it managed to do all this in just eight years, while consistently running a revenue surplus budget.Third, AAP has upset the most deeply entrenched status quo of Indian politics that uses communalism as the trump card to win elections. The “us vs them” narrative has been used creatively by parties from north to south, and west to east to win elections. In Haryana, it is Jat vs non-Jat, in Maharashtra it is Maratha vs non-Maratha, in Gujarat it is Patidar vs non-Patidar and at the national level it is the Hindu-Muslim narrative. Traditional parties have — and will continue to — divide people along caste or religious lines for political gain. But AAP has shown that the future of 21st century India is not condemned to this “us vs them” narrative. The people of Delhi and Punjab, as well as the lakhs of people who voted for AAP in Goa and Gujarat, have shown that the politics of divide and rule does not impact their voting decision. The voters of AAP ask their representatives about the work they have done or intend to do, not about their caste or religion.AAP’s emergence as a national party has changed the language of India’s governance and politics. Political parties going on the election battlefield with a report card of their work is an increasingly common sight. AAP is still the only party, however, that asks people to vote for them only if they are satisfied with their work, and not to vote if they aren’t.The most lasting contribution of AAP, though, will be that current and future generations of Indians will no longer grow up detesting politics as we did in the 1990s, but instead, see it for what it is — the most effective way to serve people and change the destiny of our great nation.The writer is an AAP leader. Views are personal

The message in AAP's rise to the status of national party
Don’t represent Kejriwal in court: Cong’s Ajay Maken appeals to his party
The Indian Express | 1 month ago | |
The Indian Express
1 month ago | |

Differences within the Congress over its approach towards the AAP and the excise policy case came out in the open once again on Sunday, with senior Congress leader Ajay Maken asking lawyer-leaders in the party to “refrain from representing (Arvind) Kejriwal or his government in court”.Maken said Kejriwal and his associates faced “serious corruption charges”, which needed to be probed and those found guilty be punished. His comments come days after Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge reached out to Kejriwal after the latter was issued CBI summons in the excise case.“It is important for all political leaders, including those from the Indian National Congress, to recognise that money gained through corrupt means by Kejriwal has been used against the Congress in several states…,” Maken claimed in a statement, which he tweeted.“I appeal to capable advocates and senior working committee members, now steering committee members, to please refrain from representing Kejriwal or his government in court… doing so… sends a wrong message to our cadres and confuses them,” Maken said, adding that this “benefits BJP by dividing Congress votes”.Kejriwal, Maken stated, had founded the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in 2013 with the aim of fighting corruption, following the Anna Hazare movement and promised to enact the Lokpal bill, which was viewed by the opposition parties as “a solution to corruption in the Congress Party”.However, he alleged further, Kejriwal dissolved his own government in February 2014, just 40 days after coming to power, demanding a strong Lokpal bill but, in December 2015, introduced a “watered-down version” of the Lokpal Bill that “differed greatly from the original” bill proposed in 2014.“This exposes the true character and intentions of Kejriwal. The original bill, which formed the basis for dissolving his 40-day government, has yet to be implemented,” Maken alleged.

Don’t represent Kejriwal in court: Cong’s Ajay Maken appeals to his party
As BJP keeps chipping away, 6 AAP corporators switch sides in city that gave it first Gujarat boost
The Indian Express | 1 month ago | |
The Indian Express
1 month ago | |

BARELY had its celebrations for qualifying as a national party ended, when the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) got a jolt in Gujarat, where six of its corporators from the Surat Municipal Corporation joined the BJP on Friday. Surat had become the first city in Gujarat to see a decisive AAP footprint when the Congress was replaced by the AAP as the main opposition party in its 2021 municipal corporation elections. After this toehold, the AAP had gone on to win five Assembly seats in the 2022 polls.The AAP had won 27 of 120 seats in the Surat Municipal Corporation (SMC), mostly in Patidar-dominated areas. It had lost six of them in February 22 to the BJP, two of whom later returned. While the AAP strength in the SMC is down to 17, the BJP is now at 103.In the 2015 municipal elections, the wards won by the AAP had gone to the Congress due to the Hardik Patel-led Patidar reservation agitation. In 2021, the Congress got no seat due to differences with Patidar leaders.The entry of AAP in Surat was seen as a setback for the home and bastion of state BJP chief C R Paatil, who is also an MP from Surat.The six AAP corporators who left earlier were first-time winners Vipul Movaliya (ward number 16), Ruta Kakadiya (ward number 3), Jyotika Lathiya (ward 8), Kundan Kothia (ward no. 4), Bhavna Solanki (ward 2) and Manisha Kukadiya (ward 5). While Kothia and Kukadiya returned within two months, the tide had begun turning against the AAP in Surat.In the December 2022 Assembly elections, the AAP’s victories came from central Gujarat and Saurashtra, but all of its heavyweights, like state general secretary Manoj Sorathiya, state president Gopal Italia, Alpesh Kathirya and Dharmik Malaviya — Patidars who contested the Assembly elections from seats in Surat — lost.The AAP has also been struggling to hold onto its MLAs — Bhupat Bhayani from Visavadar seat, Umesh Makwana from Botad, Hemant Khava from Jamjodhpur, Sudhir Vaghani from Gariadhar, and Chaitar Vasava from Dediapada. Since the results, there have been constant rumours of AAP MLAs being in talks with the BJP. Recently, Delhi Chief Minister and AAP supremo Arvind Kejriwal called all five of them to Delhi, in what was seen as damage control.The AAP was reportedly taken by surprise when the latest corporators to cross over — Ashok Dhami (ward no. 5), Kiran Khokhani (ward no. 5), Ghanshyam Makwana (ward no 4), Nirali Patel (ward no. 5), Dharmendra Vavaliya (ward no. 4) and Swati Kayda (ward no 17) — reached the Surat city BJP office late Friday evening and joined the party in the presence of Surat city BJP president Niranjan Janjmera, state Home Minister Harsh Sanghavi and Minister of State for Education Praful Pansheriya.AAP state president Isudan Gadhvi rushed to Surat and met the rest of the corporators. In a video message put out late Friday, he condemned the BJP: “The BJP won 156 seats in the Gujarat Assembly elections, but five AAP MLA are irritating them, so they are now planning to lure them. I wanted to send a message that the five AAP MLA in Gujarat Assembly are our Pandavas and they will not be purchased or come under any threat.”Another AAP corporator, Deepti Sakariya (ward no. 7), has alleged that Pansheriya tried to “lure them with money”. In a video put out late Friday on social media, she said, “On Thursday, we were at Gandhinagar to make representations to the Chief Minister for grants for SMC development works. In the afternoon, our colleague Kiran Khokhani asked some AAP corporators to visit Education Minister Pansheriya’s office. Along with six corporators, I went to Pansheriya’s office, where he tried to lure us with money if we joined the BJP, given the brighter prospects. While I kept silent, it seems the others had made up their mind to join the BJP. After returning to Surat on Thursday evening, I spoke about this with state AAP general secretary Manoj Sorathiya. Our party leaders tried to reach these six corporators, including Kiran Khokhani, but they were incommunicado. Late evening on Friday, these six corporators joined the BJP in Surat. Now those who are left are firm that they will not leave the party and will struggle for the people’s rights.”The defectors The Indian Express spoke to gave different reasons for joining the BJP. Nirali Patel said she joined the BJP because public development works were affected. “Development works in our ward were intentionally not done. We could not justify this to people, nor could we improve our performance. By joining the BJP, those obstacles for development works in our wards have been removed and work will be finished speedily. In the AAP we were humiliated and insulted, and we had decided to leave the party much earlier.”Dhami said, “Top AAP leaders used to pressure us to protest and sit on dharna (against the BJP). If the BJP is doing good work, we should appreciate that.”Another AAP corporator from ward no. 4 who left the party to join the BJP, Dharmendra Vavalia, said, “After the last Assembly elections, top AAP leaders felt the party lost due to me, as I had wept in public during the campaign. Our candidate lost the election and all the responsibility has been put on my shoulders. They (AAP leaders) were putting pressure on me to leave the party, so now I have joined the BJP.”He added, “Till the next SMC elections in 2026, we will work hard in our ward and get all the works done. If the party decides to repeat us, we will continue. If it decides to give the ticket to another person, we’ll keep our heads low and continue to work as ordinary party members.”A veteran leader in the Surat city BJP unit, on condition of anonymity, said, “We accept these AAP corporators as our brothers. The BJP is becoming stronger day by day. It is like a triple engine government. With the induction of AAP leaders into the BJP, some of the BJP leaders and workers may be unhappy, as they had worked against them in the election campaign, and now have to give them a seat. Then again, it is a general record in our party that outsiders don’t have a long run in it.”

As BJP keeps chipping away, 6 AAP corporators switch sides in city that gave it first Gujarat boost
Ex-Bengaluru police chief ready for a new partner: a history-sheeter, rival BJP ticket aspirant
The Indian Express | 1 month ago | |
The Indian Express
1 month ago | |

“Policing and politics,” Bhaskar Rao says, “are two different things.”That is the retired IPS officer and former Bengaluru police commissioner’s way of saying why he doesn’t see anything unusual in seeking the help of a known rowdy, Sunil alias ‘Silent’ Sunil, to get elected, now that he is on the other side of the ropes as a poll contestant.Till recently the Karnataka vice-president of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), which has ambitious plans for the state, Rao only recently moved to the BJP and was given the ticket from Chamrajpet constituency in Bengaluru.But ‘Silent’ Sunil, who has been appearing at BJP public events recently and nursing the Chamrajpet constituency to make the leap into politics, expected the ticket, and his supporters didn’t hide their displeasure the moment the news came of Rao’s nomination.It was when asked about these protests that Rao said that he was ready to seek Sunil’s help as well, adding: “Policing and politics are two different things. I cannot be doing a policing job when I am in politics. It is a different chapter and we need to respect every individual (to whom) the Constitution has provided rights. The police chapter is over.”Incidentally, Rao’s first choice was apparently a seat in Basavanagudi area, which has a large Brahmin population (Rao is a Madhwa Brahmin) and where the BJP is considered strong.Chamarajpet, in contrast, comprises a significant Muslim and backward class population. Plus, it is a stronghold of Congress leader B Z Zameer Ahmed Khan, who has won four times from here (thrice on JD-S ticket). The last time a BJP candidate won from Chamarajpet was lawyer and women rights activist Pramila Nesargi in 1994.In the 2018 Assembly elections, Khan had won by a margin of 33,137 votes, more than the total votes the BJP candidate got.Rao, hence, can do with all the help he can get.A BJP leader said they wanted to accommodate Rao as he had shifted sides from the AAP on the assurance of a ticket. Plus, the party wanted to keep off Sunil, as association with him was seen as giving the party a bad image.With a record going back to 1996, Sunil has about 17 cases against him, including three murders, extortion and dacoity. In December 2022, even while “absconding” as per police records, Sunil had attended a statehood day event in Chamarajpet where he shared the dais with BJP MPs Tejasvi Surya and P C Mohan.The Opposition outcry that followed had led the BJP to distance itself from Sunil, though he continued to pursue a ticket.Police officials refuse to comment on record on the cases against Sunil, several of which are pending now in courts.While Sunil was not available for comment, one of his associates said he was “holding discussions”. “He has not spoken to anyone in the media since the ticket was announced. He will take a call in a day or two, and inform everyone,” the associate said.

Ex-Bengaluru police chief ready for a new partner: a history-sheeter, rival BJP ticket aspirant
Majority of CMs are graduates and post-graduates: ADR report
The Indian Express | 1 month ago | |
The Indian Express
1 month ago | |

At a time when the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has raised issues with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s educational qualifications, a new report shows that most chief ministers are either graduates or post-graduates.The Association for Democratic Reforms, an independent electoral watchdog, found that 37 per cent of the 30 current chief ministers have declared themselves to be graduates, 14 per cent as “graduate professional”, and 30 per cent as post-graduates. Three per cent of each of the CMs are Class 10 pass and doctorate and diploma holders. In addition, 10 per cent of the CMs said they were “12th Pass”, as per their election affidavits.The ADR report, which was published Wednesday, also found that 43 per cent of the chief ministers had declared serious criminal charges pending against them. All but one of the chief ministers – West Bengal’s Mamata Banerjee – had assets over Rs. 1 crore. Banerjee’s assets as per her latest election affidavit were Rs.15.38 lakh.Since the Gujarat High Court on March 31 set aside a Central Information Commission order asking Gujarat University to give Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal information on Modi’s degree, the AAP has taken the issue to the streets. Posters asking for the PM’s degree to be shown, its “Degree Dikahao” campaign, have been put up in Delhi, and AAP leaders have addressed press conferences asking questions about PM Modi’s BA and MA degrees.Reacting to the High Court’s decision to not allow him access to the information, Kejriwal had said in a tweet: “Doesn’t the country even have the right to know how educated their PM is? They were opposed to showing his degree in court. Why? Those who demand to see his degree will be fined? What is happening? An illiterate or less educated PM is very dangerous for the country.”BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra had hit back at the AAP chief, saying: “What Kejriwal is doing reflects his frustration. He is naturally frustrated as his government ministers are in jail on charges of corruption and being involved in a liquor scam. His comments are a consequence of this.”

Majority of CMs are graduates and post-graduates: ADR report
BJP to protest against vacation notice to Delhi State Haj Committee
The Indian Express | 1 month ago | |
The Indian Express
1 month ago | |

Accusing the government of challenging the dignity of the city’s Muslim population during the holy month of Ramzan, the BJP said it will protest a notice served to vacate the Delhi State Haj Committee office outside Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s residence.According to the BJP, which now holds sway over the Committee through its Minority Morcha leader and Delhi State Haj Committee president Kausar Jahan, the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) had asked it to vacate its Turkman Gate office within 10 days on April 1 citing non-payment of dues of over ₹1.30 crore.The BJP has accused the ruling Aam Aadmi Party of resorting to petty politics by getting the vacation notice served soon after it lost the Delhi State Haj Committee elections in February. According to BJP national spokesperson Shazia Ilmi, the office of the Committee had been serving out of the building for the last three decades.The BJP argued that for the last eight years, the Committee was under the administrative control of the AAP and it was under its tenure that rental dues of over ₹1.31 crore had accumulated.Jahan has alleged that the AAP government first tried to disrupt the daily work of the Committee after losing the election and then suddenly served the vacation notice on it on April 1 even as putting in place preparations for the pilgrimage for the city’s residents.“On the one hand, the Delhi government has been trying to stall our daily office work, while on the other hand, the Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has not responded to our letters regarding Haj preparations till date,” Jahan alleged earlier this month.

BJP to protest against vacation notice to Delhi State Haj Committee