Supreme Court to hear Oppn plea against 'arbitrary' use of ED, CBI on April 5

The Indian Express | 10 hours ago | 24-03-2023 | 11:45 am

Supreme Court to hear Oppn plea against 'arbitrary' use of ED, CBI on April 5

Fourteen political parties, led by the Congress, moved the Supreme Court Friday against the “arbitrary” use of central probe agencies including the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Enforcement Directorate (ED) against opposition leaders, news agency PTI reported.A bench headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud took note of the submissions of senior advocate AM Singhvi, appearing for the opposition parties such as the DMK, RJD, Bharat Rashtra Samiti and the Trinamool Congress, and said the plea would be taken up for hearing on April 5“Ninety five per cent cases are against opposition leaders. We are asking for pre-arrest guidelines and post-arrest guidelines,” Singhvi said, news agency PTI reported. The parties are seeking pre- and post-arrest guidelines to be followed by the central probe agencies such as the CBI and ED.

Google Follow Image

Similar News

SC probe panel will be Adani-centric; govt will get clean chit: Congress
The Indian Express | 1 day ago | 23-03-2023 | 11:45 am
The Indian Express
1 day ago | 23-03-2023 | 11:45 am

The Narendra Modi government will get a “clean chit” from the expert committee of the Supreme Court, appointed in the wake of the Hindenburg Research report on the Adani Group, as the committee’s focus will be “Adani-centric”, the Congress alleged Wednesday.The party maintained that only a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) probe can bring out the truth.Former Union minister and Congress general secretary in-charge of communications, Jairam Ramesh, said the court-appointed committee will not ask questions of the government, as its focus will primarily remain on the business group.Addressing the media, Ramesh said: “The SC committee is Adani-centred. The questions we raise are aimed at PM Modi and the government. The SC committee will not raise these questions. Only the JPC can deliberate on these questions. The BJP will have a majority in the JPC and also have its MP as the chairperson, but the Opposition will get the opportunity to raise these questions, obtain responses from the government, and everything will go on record.”Ramesh also alleged that the “Adani scam” was not limited to the stock market but is closely connected to the “PM’s intention and policies”. The fundamental difference between the SC panel and the JPC, in the event of its formation, will be in the nature of the questions that are raised and examined, he said. “The SC panel will not ask questions of the government but rather give it a clean chit. This committee is nothing but an effort to remove the taint from the government and the PM. This is a ‘clean chit for the government committee’,” Ramesh said.

SC probe panel will be Adani-centric; govt will get clean chit: Congress
Cong counter to Rahul notice: asks CBI to summon Amit Shah over Meghalaya govt charges
The Indian Express | 1 day ago | 23-03-2023 | 11:45 am
The Indian Express
1 day ago | 23-03-2023 | 11:45 am

The Congress has written to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to “summon” Home Minister Amit Shah to gather information regarding his charges of corruption against the National People’s Party (NPP) government in Meghalaya ahead of the Assembly elections held in the state last month.In a letter dated March 21, addressed to CBI Director Subodh Kumar Jaiswal, senior Congress leader Jairam Ramesh said it was necessary to question Shah since “for some inexplicable reasons” he has “failed” to act upon the information based on which he made the allegations.Ramesh said Shah termed the NPP government as the “most corrupt government in the country” during a rally on February 17.I have written to the Director of CBI asking CBI to question the Home Minister further on his categorical assertion that Conrad Sangma’s Govt in Meghalaya was the most corrupt in the country-That of course did not prevent BJP from supporting the same Conrad Sangma again. pic.twitter.com/PxJn52J8ui— Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) March 23, 2023https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js“In his capacity as the Home Minister, he would surely have had access to information and facts that led him to the above conclusion. For some inexplicable reasons, the Home Minister, who is also the former national president of the BJP, has failed to act upon the information regarding the corrupt practices and instances of the then Meghalaya government,” Ramesh wrote.“Therefore, in the highest national interest, we urge you to summon Shri Amit Shah and ask him to submit all the information and facts that led him to stated assessment and investigate the matter,” Ramesh added.The Congress’ move comes days after the Delhi Police served a notice to party MP Rahul Gandhi over his remarks made at Srinagar during a rally marking the culmination of the Bharat Jodo Yatra, on alleged instances of sexual abuse against women.Through the notice, the Congress said, police have sought details about women along the march who had come and complained to Rahul about domestic violence, molestation and harassment. Police officials had even reached the former Congress president’s residence in connection with the notice, drawing allegations of “intimidation” and “vendetta” from the Opposition party.In his preliminary reply to the police, Rahul termed the police action “unprecedented” and asked whether this had anything to do with his position taken both inside and outside Parliament on the Adani issue.

Cong counter to Rahul notice: asks CBI to summon Amit Shah over Meghalaya govt charges
BJP looks to stand its ground even as Vokkaliga seer joins pushback against narrative on Tipu Sultan's death
The Indian Express | 1 day ago | 23-03-2023 | 11:45 am
The Indian Express
1 day ago | 23-03-2023 | 11:45 am

Karnataka BJP leaders, especially those from the Vokkaliga community, appear to be sticking to the claim that Vokkaliga chieftains Uri Gowda and Nanje Gowda killed 18th-Century Mysuru ruler Tipu Sultan despite the community’s prominent religious leader Nirmalananda Swamy saying the issue should not be raised as it lacks historical evidence.Prominent among the leaders pushing the narrative is BJP national general secretary C T Ravi. Though the Vokkaliga leader told reporters on Tuesday that he respects Nirmalananda Swamy’s comments, hinting at defying those directions he said he would hold discussions with the Vokkaliga religious leader. “We will furnish relevant documents and discuss the matter with the seer,” Ravi said, maintaining that Uri Gowda and Nanje Gowda had not received their due of late.The BJP leaders’ claims, which are disputed by historians, have already triggered a political controversy in the state. Janata Dal (Secular) leader H D Kumaraswamy has lashed out at BJP leaders for attempting to malign the Vokkaliga community by making baseless claims — a view echoed by Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC) president D K Shivakumar. The state Congress chief even urged Nirmalananda Swamy to lead an agitation against BJP leaders for making such claims. Even the Karnataka Rajya Vokkaligara Sangha — the largest organisation of the community dominant in south Karnataka — has criticised the BJP over the issue.By claiming that the two Vokkaligas killed Tipu, the BJP is attempting to pander to the right-wing camps in the community with the ultimate objective of making electoral gains in the coming elections. Muniratna, the state horticulture minister, last week announced a movie on Uri Gowda and Nanje Gowda which he called off after meeting Nirmalananda Swamy. The Vokkaligas have traditionally voted for the JD(S) and the Congress but this time around the BJP is eyeing to make inroads into the community as their support will be crucial if the party has to emerge as the winner with a simple majority.Nirmalananda Swamy, who leads the Adichunchanagiri mutt in Mandya, told BJP leaders on Monday not to speak on the issue without any evidence. “Such claims will lead to confusion and doubt. There are several issues concerning the community that can be raised. We can’t sideline these and just highlight their pet claim,” he said.

BJP looks to stand its ground even as Vokkaliga seer joins pushback against narrative on Tipu Sultan's death
Rahul Gandhi sentenced to 2 years in jail for ‘Modi surname’ defamation case, gets bail to appeal
The Indian Express | 1 day ago | 23-03-2023 | 11:45 am
The Indian Express
1 day ago | 23-03-2023 | 11:45 am

The Surat District Court sentenced Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to two years in jail in a 2019 criminal defamation case filed against him for his alleged “Modi surname” remarks. Moments later, he was granted bail by the court and the order was stayed for a period of 30 days so the Congress leader can appeal in a higher court.The case was filed against Gandhi on a complaint lodged by BJP MLA and former Gujarat minister Purnesh Modi for remarks he had made at a Lok Sabha election rally in Karnataka’s Kolar on April 13, 2019.“Why all the thieves, be it Nirav Modi, Lalit Modi or Narendra Modi, have Modi in their names,” the Congress leader had allegedly said during the rally.Reacting to the court order outside Parliament on Thursday, Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju said the Congress was “suffering” because of Gandhi’s “attitude”. “Whatever Rahul Gandhi says  always affects Congress party and the entire nation in a negative way,” he told news agency ANI.On Friday, Chief Judicial Magistrate HH Verma heard the final arguments in the defamation case.Gandhi’s counsel Kirit Panwala made the final arguments before the court. “We will today send a message to Rahul Gandhi to remain present on March 23 in the Surat district court. Most probably, he would be present in the court. We will get confirmation on Saturday,” said Panwala.Gandhi had last appeared before the Surat court in the case, filed under Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections 499 and 500 (dealing with defamation), in October 2021 to record his statement.With PTI inputs

Rahul Gandhi sentenced to 2 years in jail for ‘Modi surname’ defamation case, gets bail to appeal
Mehul Choksi to Zakir Naik, govt struggles to bring back fugitives holed up abroad
The Indian Express | 2 days ago | 22-03-2023 | 11:45 am
The Indian Express
2 days ago | 22-03-2023 | 11:45 am

Interpol removing the Red Notice against Punjab National Bank (PNB) loan fraud case accused Mehul Choksi has brought the focus back on Indian fugitives who are now abroad, with the Opposition on Tuesday taking on the BJP-led Central government. Taking a dig at Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge said while central agencies were being used against Opposition leaders, the PM’s “Mehul bhai” was getting a free pass. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi also hit out at the government over the matter.There are more than 270 Indians against whom a Red Notice has been issued. Of them, more than 30 are economic offenders accused of large-scale money laundering or bank fraud.A look at the status of India’s efforts to get some of the key offenders back to the country:The key accused in the Rs 13,500-crore PNB loan fraud case fled India in January 2018 days before the Central Bureau of India (CBI) registered a case against him. Months before this, he had taken citizenship of Antigua and Barbuda in the Caribbean.India’s attempts to get Choksi back have been the most dramatic. Based on requests from CBI and the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Interpol issued a Red Notice against Choksi. An extradition request was also subsequently sent to Antigua to get Choksi back. While this remained pending in the court there, Choksi was allegedly kidnapped and ferried in a yacht in May 2021 to Dominica, where the authorities put him under arrest for “illegal entry” after the local media began reporting about his arrival.Subsequently, a private jet carrying officials from the CBI and Ministry of External Affairs arrived in Dominica to get him back to India. However, after the case went to court on grounds of illegal entry against Choksi, the jet had to return.Choksi’s legal team was able to secure bail for him and take him back to Antigua. It also accused the Indian government of orchestrating the kidnapping through its agents in an attempt to deport him to India through Dominica. Later, Dominica dropped all charges against Choksi.In a major setback for India, Interpol, while removing the Red Notice against Choksi, said there was “credible evidence” of his kidnapping and that there were “risks” of him not receiving a fair trial in India. This development could now complicate India’s efforts to extradite Choksi back to India.Choksi’s nephew Nirav Modi, his partner in crime in the PNB case, fled India to London around the same time as Choksi. The CBI got a Red Notice issued against Modi in 2018 followed by an extradition request to the UK. Modi was arrested on India’s extradition warrant in March 2019 and his extradition was approved by the court in February 2021, and by the government that April. Last December, Modi lost his final appeal to the UK Supreme Court following which he should have arrived in India within 28 days after the UK Home Secretary’s assent.However, he has yet to arrive in India. Sources said his extradition was stuck because of another “legal matter” pending in court. This, sources said, was speculated to be an asylum application.The former liquor baron is perhaps the most high-profile of fugitives from India. Mallya is accused of cheating and money laundering in connection with the Rs 9,000-crore Kingfisher Airlines loan fraud case. Mallya left India for London in March 2016 following the CBI’s investigation into the collapse of Kingfisher Airlines.After this, CBI not only got a Red Notice issued against him but sent an extradition request to the UK. Mallya was arrested on an extradition warrant by UK authorities in October 2017 and subsequently, all proceedings were completed. His last appeal against extradition was rejected by the UK Supreme Court in May 2020 following which he should have been extradited to India within days after the UK Home Secretary’s assent.However, his extradition continues to be held up on account of some “secret proceedings” in a UK court that sources say are attempts by Mallya to seek asylum in the UK.The Vadodara-based Sandesaras, including Chetan’s wife Depti and their relative Hansmukh Patel, are accused in the Rs 20,000-crore Sterling Biotech loan fraud case. All have Interpol Red Notices open against them on requests from the CBI and the ED. Shortly before the two agencies began their investigations in 2017, the family left India and reached Nigeria via Dubai.The Sandesaras have since taken citizenship of both Nigeria and Albania and have made massive investments in both countries using the money allegedly siphoned off from Indian banks. While they run an oil business in Nigeria, in Albania they have made investments in the real estate business.India has sent an extradition request to both countries. However, both Nigeria and Albania have refused to honour the Interpol Red Notices and made no positive movement on India’s requests to extradite them. Nigeria’s attorney general’s office has called the case “political” while Albania has been dragging its feet in the name of conducting investigations on India’s charges. In 2019, Albania appointed Nitin Sandesara as an honourary consul to Nigeria.The former Indian Premier League (IPL) chairman, the chief architect of the cricket league, has been under investigation by various agencies in connection with forex violations and a Rs 425-crore TV rights deal with World Sports Group for the 2009 edition of the IPL. After attending just one interrogation session with Income Tax and ED sleuths in Mumbai over some matters related to forex violations, Lalit Modi fled to the UK in May 2010.Chennai Police was the first to register an FIR in connection with the TV rights deal case. Based on it, the ED began money laundering investigations in 2012. Following this, the ED’s multiple requests to Interpol to issue a Red Notice against Modi were not successful. In March 2017, Interpol issued an order not only refusing a Red Notice, but it also deleted all data on Modi from its records.The order, dated March 24, said, “After a thorough examination of elements before it, the Commission concluded that data challenged were not compliant with Interpol’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and recommended their deletion.”One of the prime reasons for this has been that neither Chennai Police nor the ED was able to file a chargesheet in the case. In 2017, Tamil Nadu Police wrote to Mumbai Police to take over the case since the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) was based in the city. The latter refused to do so and the probe into the primary offence itself has not progressed any further. No extradition request is pending against Modi.Fugitive arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari is being probed in multiple cases by different agencies, including Delhi Police, the Income-Tax Department, the CBI and the ED. Bhandari first came under the scanner of the agencies in 2016 when the I-T Department raided his premises in connection with information about the non-declaration of certain assets he held abroad. This case has now dovetailed into one on certain assets held by Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi’s husband Robert Vadra in London.The CBI began a preliminary enquiry in 2016 into Bhandari’s role in the signing of an aircraft deal between the Indian Air Force and Swiss firm Pilatus Aircraft in which kickbacks were suspected to have been paid. This, too, was turned into an FIR. By that time, however, Bhandari had left India for London.Following this, Delhi Police sent a request to Interpol to issue a Red Notice but in 2017 it was declined by the international organisation, which termed the case to be of “political nature”. India sent the UK a request for Bhandari’s extradition in 2019, which was forwarded to the relevant court in June 2020.The following month, Bhandari was arrested.The Westminster Court in London approved India’s extradition request for Bhandari in May 2022 after which it was sent to UK Home Secretary Suella Braverman for her assent. Braverman approved Sanjay Bhandari’s extradition to India on January 17. Subsequently, Bhandari moved the UK High Court against the extradition order.The National Investigation Agency (NIA) booked Islamic preacher Zakir Naik and his organisation Islamic Research Foundation (IRF) under stringent provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) even as the government banned the IRF following revelations that the accused in the 2016 Dhaka cafe attack, in which 22 people were killed, had been inspired by Naik’s speeches.Naik fled India around this time and in 2017 filed an application seeking asylum in Malaysia. While India is pursuing his extradition from Malaysia, Interpol has thrice declined India’s request to issue a Red Notice against him, the last one being in 2021. Interpol has rejected the NIA’s chargesheet in the case saying asking for donations during speeches and promoting religion does not constitute a criminal offence.

Mehul Choksi to Zakir Naik, govt struggles to bring back fugitives holed up abroad