During UPA regime, CBI was 'putting pressure' on me to 'frame' Modi: Shah

The Indian Express | 1 hour ago | 30-03-2023 | 11:45 am

During UPA regime, CBI was 'putting pressure' on me to 'frame' Modi: Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday said the CBI was “putting pressure” on him to “frame” Prime Minister Narendra Modi in an alleged fake encounter case in Gujarat when he was being questioned by the probe agency during the Congress-led UPA government.Shah said this at the ‘News 18 Rising India’ programme in New Delhi in response to a question on Opposition’s charge that the Narendra Modi government is “misusing’ central agencies to target them.The CBI “was putting pressure” on me to “frame Modi ji” (when he was Gujarat CM) in an alleged fake encounter case during the Congress government,” he said, adding that the BJP never raised a ruckus despite this.On Rahul Gandhi’s conviction in a criminal defamation case by a court in Surat, the home minister said the Congress leader was not the only politician who was convicted by a court and lost membership of the legislature.Instead of moving to a higher court, Rahul has been trying to create hue and cry and blaming Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his fate, he said.Shah said Rahul Gandhi should go to a higher court to fight his case, instead of trying to put the blame on Prime Minister Narendra Modi.He said the Congress is spreading misconception; conviction can’t be stayed. “The sentence can be stayed if the court decides,” he said.“He has not appealed to take stay on his conviction. What kind of arrogance is this? You want a favour. You want to continue to be MP and will also not go before the Court,” Shah said.Where does such arrogance gets generated, he said.Shah said 17 prominent leaders, including Lalu Prasad, J Jayalalitha and Raashid Alvi, had lost their membership because of a 2013 Supreme Court order during the UPA government, which said an elected representative would lose his seat immediately after conviction. Still, no one protested wearing black clothes because it is the “law of the land”, he said.“Listen to the full speech of Rahul Gandhi, he has not only spoken abusive words for Modi ji. He has spoken abusive words for the entire Modi community and OBC society,” he said.“The law of the land is clear. There is no question of vendetta politics. It is the judgment of the Supreme Court of India, which had come during their government,” Shah said.Asked about the notice to vacate his bungalow, Shah asked why should there be “special favour” when the Supreme Court had said to act as soon as the conviction comes into effect.“It was a deliberate statement by Rahul Gandhi. If Rahul Gandhi did not want to apologise, then he should not have applied for bail. Let him not apologise,” Shah said.“This gentleman is not the first one. Politicians who held much bigger positions and with much more experience have lost their membership because of this provision,” the Home minister said.He said India’s democracy wasn’t threatened when Lalu ji was disqualified but it is endangered only when a person from the Gandhi family is disqualified.“Now it has come on him, so they are saying make a separate law for the Gandhi family. I want to ask the people of this country whether there should be a separate law for a single family. What kind of mentality is this? Whatever happens, they start blaming Modi ji and the Lok Sabha Speaker,” Shah said.He said senior lawyers who are Congress MPs in Rajya Sabha should tell their colleagues that Lok Sabha Speaker has no role in the disqualification.“It is the law of the country that all his speeches in Parliament would have to be erased from the records from the moment of his conviction. Even if his disqualification notice were served a few days later, it would have no purpose,” he said.Shah said BJP did not want changes in the Supreme Court order. The Manmohan Singh government brought an Ordinance to blunt the apex court order, but Rahul Gandhi tore it apart, calling it “nonsense”.“Once he tore it apart, who in his government would have dared to turn it into law? It was vetoed. Had that ordinance become a law, he could have been saved,” Shah said.Asked about Rahul’s comment on Savarkar, the Home Minister said Veer Savarkar was the only freedom fighter who was sentenced to two life terms in Andaman prison. “Such language for such a freedom fighter should not have been used,” he said.He (Rahul) should read his grandmother’s speech on Veer Savarkar. His own party people are advising him to not speak against Savarkar, he said.In the general election of 2024, Shah said Modi would again be PM with a larger majority. BJP will get more seats in the 2024 elections than 2019 elections, he said, adding that there is no unity among the opposition, he said.On the upcoming Karnataka elections, Shah said BJP would comfortably cross the halfway mark and form a government with a clear majority in the state.Ruling out any alliance in Karnataka, Shah said, “The BJP will definitely cross the halfway mark and form the government with an absolute majority in Karnataka. We will win record mandate.” Referring to recent Karnataka government’s decision to end quota on the basis of religion, he said reservation based on religion is unconstitutional.“Karnataka’s Congress government did it due to polarisation, and we have just rectified it. It should have done earlier,” he said.The Home minister rejected the allegations on the misuse of investigative agencies against the opposition leaders. Shah said we never blamed the opposition for anything, innocent police officers were put behind bars during Congress government.Shah said the BJP had won the 2014 and 2019 elections on the plank of anti-corruption. He said Enforcement Directorate had seized 1.10 lakh crore of assets, of which not even five per cent are of political leaders.“Shall we stop the fight against corruption? Should we not act if the accused is a politician,” Shah asked. The Home minister asked who had filed cases against Lalu Prasad Yadav and who had sent a plane full of officials from Delhi to arrest Shaikh Abdullah.Citing the misuse of agencies, Shah said thousands of innocent persons were imprisoned for 19 months of Emergency and questioned whose doing it was. It was his grandmother Indira Gandhi, he said.On the Maharashtra question, Shah said people wanted Shiv Sena and BJP government and now the real Shiv Sena is with BJP. “I also accept that BJP on its own could have formed the government in Maharashtra. There is no question of the merger of Shiv Sena,” he said.He said the Congress should introspect about its contribution to corruption. There is a strong resentment against Congress governments in Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh. We will definitely win elections in Madhya Pradesh, he said.Shah said we have not taken any decision on the face in Rajasthan elections. People want to change the CM of Rajasthan, he said.On Amritpal Singh, Shah said he meets Punjab Chief Minister every three months, irrespective of the government and stand with the party when it comes to the security of the country.“Many people have been arrested in connection with Amritpal case, police and intelligence agencies are working on the case,” he said.On attacks on Indian missions abroad, Shah said it was an attack on India. “We will take action against those involved in the attack, FIR already lodged in Delhi,” he said. Shah said the contribution of Sikhs to India’s freedom has been immense; every Sikh wants to be with India.The Home minister ruled out any confrontation between the judiciary and the government. “Both are working within their limits,” he said. The government’s duty to make law now and the Parliament will think over it, he said 

Google Follow Image

Similar News

'Expect democratic principles to be applied': Germany on Rahul's disqualification
The Indian Express | 1 hour ago | 30-03-2023 | 11:45 am
The Indian Express
1 hour ago | 30-03-2023 | 11:45 am

Reacting to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s disqualification from the Parliament, Germany said Thursday that it has taken note of the case and “expects that the standards of judicial independence and fundamental democratic principles will apply”.The German Foreign Ministry spokesperson made the statement during a press briefing that was aired on German state-owned international broadcaster Deutsche Welle (DW).“We have taken note of the verdict of the first instance against the Indian opposition politician Rahul Gandhi as well as the suspension of his parliamentary mandate. To our knowledge, Rahul Gandhi is in a position to appeal the verdict. An appeal will show whether the verdict stands and whether suspension has a basis. We expect standards of judicial independence and democratic principles to be applied,” the spokesperson said.NEW: Rahul Gandhi caseGerman Foreign Ministry spokesperson comments for first time:– Takes note of verdict, suspension from parliament– Appeal will show whether verdict stands & suspension has basis– Expects standards of judicial independence & democratic principles to apply pic.twitter.com/dNZB6vflG2— Richard Walker (@rbsw) March 29, 2023Veteran Congress leader Digvijaya Singh took to Twitter to recognise Germany’s statement. “Thank you Germany Foreign Affairs Ministry and Richard Walker for taking note of how the Democracy is being compromised in India through persecution of Rahul Gandhi,” he wrote.First Washington, now BerlinGermany’s response comes days after the United States took a similar stance, saying that respect for the rule of law and judicial independence is a cornerstone of any democracy.In a press briefing, US State Department’s Deputy spokesperson Vedant Patel had said that the US is watching Gandhi’s case in the courts.“Respect for the rule of law and judicial independence is a cornerstone of any democracy, and we’re watching Mr. Gandhi’s case in Indian courts, and we engage with the Government of India on our shared commitment to democratic values – including, of course, freedom of expression,” Patel said.“In our engagements with our Indian partners, we continue to highlight the importance of democratic principles and the protection of human rights, including freedom of expression, as a key to strengthening both our democracies,” he added.Following this, Patel was asked if the US is still engaging with Gandhi as the opposition leader. “It is normal and standard for us to engage with members of opposition parties in any country where we have bilateral relationships,” replied Patel.On March 23, Gandhi had been found guilty in a 2019 defamation case filed after his remark “why all thieves have Modi surname”, made at a campaign rally in Kolar, Karnataka. A Gujarat court had sentenced him to two years in prison. Gandhi is currently on bail.Following his conviction, he was disqualified from the Parliament, where he was an elected MP from Kerala’s Wayanad district. He was also issued a notice to vacate his official bungalow in New Delhi. 

'Expect democratic principles to be applied': Germany on Rahul's disqualification
YouTube 'looking into' claim that Rahul's Adani videos' viewership suppressedPremium Story
The Indian Express | 1 hour ago | 30-03-2023 | 11:45 am
The Indian Express
1 hour ago | 30-03-2023 | 11:45 am

Google’s video platform YouTube has told the Congress that it is looking into a claim made by party leader Rahul Gandhi that views on his videos on industrialist Gautam Adani are much lower than his other videos with similar user engagement, it is learnt.The Congress had written to YouTube earlier this month suggesting that it suspects viewership of Rahul’s two videos on Adani were suppressed.The issue was flagged by Sam Pitroda, head of the Indian Overseas Congress, in a letter to YouTube CEO Neal Mohan on March 11.“Mr Gandhi has raised the issue of cronyism of the ruling government with one industrialist, Mr Gautam Adani, through speeches in India’s Parliament and specific videos released exclusively on his YouTube channel. His team has found that the views on these videos are much lower than what they normally are for other videos of Mr Gandhi for similar user engagement,” he had stated.Pitroda had argued that Rahul’s social media team find “this a bit bizarre and are searching for an explanation. They have used YouTube’s own data and analytics to show that viewership of videos of Mr Adani are being suppressed, perhaps unwittingly or algorithmically.”To back his claim, Pitroda also forwarded a presentation made by the party’s data analytics department, comparing viewership data of the video on Adani and Rahul’s other videos from the Bharat Jodo Yatra and recent speeches in Parliament and at Cambridge University.Mohan, sources said, has replied to Pitroda saying that a “team is taking a look” at the Congress’s claim. Sources said Pitroda and Congress data analytics department head Praveen Chakravarty have had discussions with YouTube’s top executives over the issue.In the presentation, the Congress had claimed that one Bharat Jodo Yatra video has less positive interactions than the first video on Adani but has five-times more views. The container video from Yatra, it said, has 83,602 positive interactions, whereas the first video on Adani — titled ‘Mitr Kaal episode 1’ — had 99,197 interactions.But the ‘Mitr Kaal’ video got only 4.78 lakh views, compared to 20 lakh-plus views of the container video.Similarly, the party had claimed that the second video on Adani “has double the interactions of Cambridge video but similar number of views.” While the Cambridge video had 28,360 positive interactions, ‘Mitr Kaal episode-2’ had 49,053 positive interactions. Both videos had 2 lakh-plus views.“Our estimate is that Adani video, too, should have had 8 lakh views based on interactions metrics, but only has 2.6 lakh views,” the Congress said in its presentation.Arguing that there was a “clear case of algorithmic suppression”, the party said in the presentation that most people watch videos through the YouTube Browse feature, where the YouTube homepage shows videos and suggested videos.The party said the browse feature in Rahul Gandhi’s channel was down since February 9. “YouTube algorithm has suppressed the browse feature for Rahul Gandhi’s videos,” it said.

YouTube 'looking into' claim that Rahul's Adani videos' viewership suppressedPremium Story
Why Rahul Gandhi got what he deserved and what the outrage against his disqualification doesn't get
The Indian Express | 1 hour ago | 30-03-2023 | 11:45 am
The Indian Express
1 hour ago | 30-03-2023 | 11:45 am

“Deservedly Disqualified” might be a better title and theme for the editorial carried in this paper (‘Disqualified’, IE, March 25).Without being coy about it, we need to understand that the court judgment sentencing Rahul Gandhi to prison for two years for criminal defamation has effectively said that Gandhi is both a liar and hurtful to others. It would be unfair to conflate the disqualification of Gandhi after conviction for defamation with the might of the government and the supposed loss of democratic freedoms in India.Fusing the punishment of Gandhi and his being held legally unsuitable to hold public office with the decline of democracy in India and other accusations against the Narendra Modi government is neither here nor there. That the Modi government does not listen to the Opposition, that it is autocratic, are matters of political opinion and not fact.The fact is that we can do without liars and snitches in public life. The late Lily Thomas, Senior Advocate, ensured this by convincing the Supreme Court to give a judgment which removes those who are convicted criminals from elected bodies. Gandhi, in the present instance, has fallen foul of that judgement.Being a politician, a reasonably popular one at that, does not allow anyone to go on and on making irresponsible statements. Making irresponsible statements increases the likelihood of making statements that are also untrue. Once in a while these might also be hurtful to someone. On a rare occasion, someone could take matters personally, haul up the person who is making such statements to court and demand reparations. In Gandhi’s case, the corrective has come in the form of a judge sentencing him to two years of imprisonment; disqualification from holding an elected position followed automatically. If tomorrow on appeal, another judge was to overturn the two-year jail sentence or, reduce it, then his fate changes.Admittedly, the law can be an ass. At least in India, it functions in ways that can at best be called mysterious. But to imagine that a judgment we don’t like — such as sentencing Gandhi to imprisonment — is either the result of the influence of the government on the judge or, the desire of the judge to ingratiate himself with the government, would be unfair to both the judge and the entire judicial process. The fact is, as various research surveys from the Vidhi Centre have shown, Indian judges are both fair and sensitive. If anything, their problem is that they put in an extra effort to follow the written law literally.Unfounded insinuations about bias in judgments tend to weaken the very fabric of justice that holds together civility in society and opens the gates for a free-for-all in which only might is right. Trust in the judicial process is the foundation of civility in society and to undermine that because we do not like a particular judgment is an attack on civility.The usual form of political discourse in India is to make disparaging statements about one’s opponents. Withering nit-picking through which politicians seek to delegitimise their electoral opponents, taunting each other, is expected by the people of India. The millions who routinely tune in to the wild TV news channels of India love the resultant spectacle, even while everyone tut-tuts about the decline in standards of public discourse.The smarter among our politicians also indulge in tricks that shrewd lawyers use — suggest the falsehood, suppress the truth — in the hope that their audience will then conclude that what actually is true will be believed to be false, while what is actually false will be believed to be the truth. Then, much to the mirth of some in India and the distress of others, there came into public life two politicians who weren’t good at this game of rhetoric.Arvind Kejriwal and Rahul Gandhi seemed to be willing to make specific accusations that would actually torture the honour and dignity of other people on false grounds. Their usual strategy was to first make an allegation and then insist that the onus of bringing forward the evidence to support the accusation was on the accused.No other political leader in India does this. At least I don’t know of anyone else who insists that their accusations against others are correct, especially since they have no evidence to back up the accusations. Not even in what is euphemistically called the heat of the moment does anyone other than these two take this second rhetorical step. What they do is to taunt their opponents. Taunting is perfectly lawful unless it falls foul of India’s blasphemy law, Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code.In the case of Kejriwal and Gandhi, when their opponents refused to participate in their game, they intensified their rhetoric. Then Kejriwal slipped. Carried away by his own enthusiasm, he made specific allegations against specific individuals.Those persons weren’t babes in the wood either. They promptly hauled up Kejriwal for criminal defamation. After some initial bravado, Kejriwal submitted apologies to each of them. On being challenged similarly, as recently as December 2020, even Jairam Ramesh — who seems to mentor Rahul Gandhi’s public life nowadays – submitted an apology to Vivek Doval.Rahul Gandhi is different. He is still full of bluster.The writer teaches history in Panjab University, Chandigarh

Why Rahul Gandhi got what he deserved and what the outrage against his disqualification doesn't get
Cong mulls over no-confidence notice against Om Birla
The Indian Express | 1 day ago | 29-03-2023 | 11:45 am
The Indian Express
1 day ago | 29-03-2023 | 11:45 am

As the Congress on Tuesday stepped up its protest against the “hasty” disqualification of Rahul Gandhi as a Lok Sabha MP, party MP Manish Tewari is learnt to have suggested to the leadership that it should give a notice to move a no-confidence motion against Speaker Om Birla.The leadership asked Tewari to draft the notice and he handed it over on Tuesday. The party, sources said, had not yet taken a call on pursuing it. Sources said the leadership was not sure if the other Opposition parties would come on board. Sources said the leaders of some Opposition parties had signalled their reluctance to get behind such a move. The Congress leadership, sources said, does not want to do anything that may signal division in the Opposition camp.According to the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, a member “wishing to give notice of a resolution … for the removal of the Speaker or the Deputy Speaker shall do so in writing to the Secretary-General” and “on receipt of a notice … a motion for leave to move the resolution shall be entered in the list of business in the name of the member concerned, on a day fixed by the Speaker, provided that the day so fixed shall be any day after fourteen days from the date of the receipt of notice of the resolution”.Since the Budget Session of Parliament is set to conclude in a week, the move, even if pursued by the Congress, has largely symbolic value given that the motion can be listed only after 14 days from the date of the receipt of the notice. Some of the leaders said the idea could be pursued to make a political point.In 2020, 12 Opposition parties submitted a no-confidence resolution seeking the removal of Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairperson Harivansh. But then Chairperson M Venkaiah Naidu rejected it on the ground that the resolution should serve a notice period of 14 days and that it was not in “proper format”.In the past, resolutions seeking the removal of the Speaker have been given at least thrice — against the first Lok Sabha Speaker G V Mavalankar in 1951, Sardar Hukam Singh in 1966, and Balram Jakhar in 1987.

Cong mulls over no-confidence notice against Om Birla
Karnataka Assembly polls schedule to be announced today
The Indian Express | 1 day ago | 29-03-2023 | 11:45 am
The Indian Express
1 day ago | 29-03-2023 | 11:45 am

The Karnataka Assembly election schedule will be announced on Wednesday, the Election Commission of India has said.The Election Commission has called a press meeting at 11.30 am to announce the schedule of the state Legislative Assembly election 2023 in New Delhi’s Vigyan Bhawan.The term of the 224-member Karnataka Assembly ends on May 24.Karnataka accounts for 5.04 per cent of India’s population and has seen 14 Assembly polls since 1956. The political map of Karnataka has seen the steady emergence of the BJP. After its foundation in 1980, the party contested the first Assembly election in the state in 1983, winning 18 of the 110 seats it contested (out of a total of 224) and getting 7.93 per cent of the votes, wrote Harikishan Sharma in a previous report. Additionally, the one thing which has been constant in all the 14 Assembly elections held in Karnataka – barring 1985 and 1994 — is the Congress as the top performer in terms of vote share, even when it lost power. It has never dropped below 26% votes in the state. Even in the last elections in 2018, the Congress’s vote share stood at 38.04 per cent, nearly 2 per cent more than the BJP, though the latter got more seats.The 2018 elections saw chaos when the BJP’s plans to claim a simple majority in the Assembly were thwarted by a last-minute Congress-JD(U) coalition, with JD(U) leader HD Kumaraswamy as the Chief Minister. The coalition government had 120 seats while BJP had 105 seats.However, a year later, the Kumaraswamy government collapsed after a number of legislators from both parties resigned in July 2019. The next few days saw dramatic scenes with the reigned legislators fleeing to neighbouring Mumbai and asking for police protection against Congress leaders who were trying to get them to rescind the resignations. After the Speaker refused to accept the resignations, a few legislators approached the Supreme Court.The crisis ended with B S Yeddiyurappa being sworn in as the Karnataka Chief Minister on July 26, 2019, after the JD(U)-Congress coalition was reduced to 101 members while the BJP retained 105 seats. 

Karnataka Assembly polls schedule to be announced today